[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/vhost: improve Tx path selection
Tiwei Bie
tiwei.bie at intel.com
Mon Jun 4 14:25:42 CEST 2018
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:47:56PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This patch improves the Tx path selection depending on
> whether the application request for offloads, and on whether
> offload features have been negotiated.
>
> When the application doesn't request for Tx offload features,
> the corresponding features bits aren't negotiated.
>
> When Tx offload virtio features have been negotiated, ensure
> the simple Tx path isn't selected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h | 3 ---
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> index e68e9d067..5730620ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> @@ -1798,8 +1798,10 @@ static int
> virtio_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> {
> const struct rte_eth_rxmode *rxmode = &dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode;
> + const struct rte_eth_txmode *txmode = &dev->data->dev_conf.txmode;
> struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private;
> uint64_t rx_offloads = rxmode->offloads;
> + uint64_t tx_offloads = txmode->offloads;
> uint64_t req_features;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1821,6 +1823,15 @@ virtio_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) |
> (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6);
>
> + if (tx_offloads & (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
> + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM))
I think it's better to keep DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP/UDP_CKSUM
aligned, something like:
if (tx_offloads & (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM))
> + req_features |= (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM);
> +
> + if (tx_offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO)
> + req_features |=
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4) |
> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6);
> +
> /* if request features changed, reinit the device */
> if (req_features != hw->req_guest_features) {
> ret = virtio_init_device(dev, req_features);
> @@ -1885,6 +1896,11 @@ virtio_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM))
> hw->use_simple_rx = 0;
>
> + if (tx_offloads & (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
> + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
> + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO))
Ditto. I think it's better to keep them aligned,
something like:
if (tx_offloads & (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO))
Besides, we also need to consider not using simple Tx
when DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT is requested.
Best regards,
Tiwei Bie
> + hw->use_simple_tx = 0;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2138,14 +2154,14 @@ virtio_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
>
> dev_info->tx_offload_capa = DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS |
> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT;
> - if (hw->guest_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM)) {
> + if (host_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM)) {
> dev_info->tx_offload_capa |=
> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
> DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
> }
> tso_mask = (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4) |
> (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6);
> - if ((hw->guest_features & tso_mask) == tso_mask)
> + if ((host_features & tso_mask) == tso_mask)
> dev_info->tx_offload_capa |= DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
> index bb40064ea..b603665c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.h
> @@ -28,9 +28,6 @@
> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ | \
> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX | \
> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN | \
> - 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM | \
> - 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4 | \
> - 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6 | \
> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF | \
> 1u << VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU | \
> 1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE | \
> --
> 2.14.3
>
More information about the dev
mailing list