[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] memzone: improve zero-length memzone reserve

[Burakov, Anatoly]

On 14-May-18 9:21 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 11-May-18 11:25 AM, Remy Horton wrote:
>>
>> On 03/05/2018 18:18, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
>> [..]
>>> Also, fixup unit tests to account for the new behavior.
>>
>> Tried running the tests but it fails on a boundary check:
>>
>> RTE>>memzone_autotest
>> test basic memzone API
>> [...]
>> 1GB Huge pages available
>> test alignment for memzone_reserve
>> check alignments and lengths
>> check overlapping
>> test boundary alignment for memzone_reserve
>> check_memzone_bounded(MZ_TEST_bounded_128): invalid memzone boundary 
>> 128 crossed
>> Test Failed
>> RTE>>
>>
> 
> Hi Remy,
> 
> Passes here, but i'll look into it, thanks for the report.
> 

This failure is not caused by this patchset, and you should get similar 
failures on master if you get these while testing my patchset. I am not 
able to reproduce this issue, but i'll double-check the bounded reserve 
code with a fine-toothed comb anyway.

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly