[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/8] net/mvneta: add neta PMD skeleton

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Oct 2 13:53:19 CEST 2018


On 10/1/2018 10:26 AM, Andrzej Ostruszka wrote:
> From: Zyta Szpak <zr at semihalf.com>
> 
> Add neta pmd driver skeleton providing base for the further
> development.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Natalie Samsonov <nsamsono at marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yelena Krivosheev <yelena at marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitri Epshtein <dima at marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zyta Szpak <zr at semihalf.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Ostruszka <amo at semihalf.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   8 +
>  config/common_base                            |   5 +
>  devtools/test-build.sh                        |   2 +
>  doc/guides/nics/features/mvneta.ini           |  11 +
>  doc/guides/nics/mvneta.rst                    | 152 +++++++

dpdk/doc/guides/nics/mvneta.rst: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree

Please add document to doc/guides/nics/index.rst

<...>

> +Config File Options
> +-------------------
> +
> +The following options can be modified in the ``config`` file.
> +
> +- ``CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MVNETA_PMD`` (default ``n``)
> +
> +    Toggle compilation of the librte_pmd_mvneta driver.
> +

Good to have another section to document "Runtime options" (iface)

> +
> +Usage example
> +^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +   ./testpmd --vdev=net_mvneta,iface=eth0,iface=eth1 \
> +    -c 3 -- -i --p 3 -a
> +
> +
> +Building DPDK
> +-------------
> +
> +Driver needs precompiled MUSDK library during compilation.
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +   export CROSS_COMPILE=<toolchain>/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-
> +   ./bootstrap
> +   ./configure --host=aarch64-linux-gnu --enable-bpool-dma=64

getting "configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-bpool-dma"

Is this config option still valid for 18.09?

<...>

> +
> +static int mvneta_dev_num;
> +static int mvneta_lcore_first;
> +static int mvneta_lcore_last;

These static variables seems assigned but not used, can you please check?


<...>

> +
> +RTE_PMD_REGISTER_VDEV(net_mvneta, pmd_mvneta_drv);

Need to document supported devargs with RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PARAM_STRING

<...>

> +struct mvneta_priv {
> +	/* Hot fields, used in fast path. */
> +	struct neta_ppio	*ppio;    /**< Port handler pointer */
> +
> +	uint8_t pp_id;
> +	uint8_t ppio_id;	/* ppio port id */
> +	uint8_t uc_mc_flushed;
> +	uint8_t multiseg;
> +
> +	struct neta_ppio_params ppio_params;
> +	uint16_t nb_rx_queues;

Do you need this private variable, isn't it duplicate of "dev->data->nb_rx_queues"?
And as far as I can see "dev->data->nb_rx_queues" one used.


More information about the dev mailing list