[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eventdev: fix port id argument in Rx adapter caps API

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Tue Sep 25 11:50:06 CEST 2018


25/09/2018 11:15, Jerin Jacob:
> -----Original Message-----
> > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:19:12 +0530
> > From: Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao at intel.com>
> > To: jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com
> > CC: dev at dpdk.org, Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao at intel.com>, stable at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] eventdev: fix port id argument in Rx adapter caps API
> > X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1
> > 
> > 
> > Make the ethernet port id passed into
> > rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_caps_get() 16 bit.
> > 
> > Also, update the event rx adapter test to use 16 bit
> > ethernet port ids.
> > 
> > Fixes: c2189c907dd1 ("eventdev: make ethdev port identifiers 16-bit")
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao at intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v2:
> > * squash changes to autotest and library into a single patch (Jerin Jacob)
> > * add update to release notes (Jerin Jacob)
> > 
> >  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h     | 2 +-
> >  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c     | 2 +-
> >  test/test/test_event_eth_rx_adapter.c  | 6 +++---
> >  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst | 4 +++-
> >  lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile           | 2 +-
> 
> Missing version update in lib/librte_eventdev/meson.build. See version=
> 
> >  5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> >  ABI Changes
> >  -----------
> > @@ -162,7 +164,7 @@ The libraries prepended with a plus sign were incremented in this version.
> >       librte_distributor.so.1
> >       librte_eal.so.8
> >       librte_ethdev.so.10
> > -     librte_eventdev.so.4
> > +   + librte_eventdev.so.6
> 
> Can you send a separate standalone patch to fixup doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_08.rst
> release notes. The version(change to librte_eventdev.so.5) should have been 
> updated in change set in 3810ae4357.
> 
> +Thomas,
> In case if he has difference in opinion on updating released release note file.

I prefer such changes being atomic.




More information about the dev mailing list