[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] tests: Fix unit tests for shared builds

[Bruce Richardson]

On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:40:33AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:10:55PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> >> Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com> writes:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:50:29AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> >> >>> From: Michael Santana <msantana at redhat.com>
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Currently many unit tests fail when running tests under shared builds.
> >> >>> This happens because of missing driver dependencies. This is fixed by
> >> >>> explicitly linking in missing drivers for the test application.
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> before and after (clang):
> >> >>> https://travis-ci.com/Maickii/dpdk-2/jobs/212329160#L623
> >> >>> https://travis-ci.com/Maickii/dpdk-2/jobs/212335912#L620
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Suggested-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
> >> >>> Suggested-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Santana <msantana at redhat.com>
> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
> >> >>> ---
> >> >> Rather than linking in the libraries explicitly, can you have the build do
> >> >> a "ninja install" at the end to place the libraries and drivers in their
> >> >> correct paths. That should mean that the test app (via eal) auto-loads all
> >> >> drivers from EAL_PMD_PATH (/usr/local/...). It would save having to make
> >> >> further changes to this file to link in any additional drivers.
> >> 
> >> Oops, forgot to include a link to a build where I did this.  It's
> >> failing (you can see the corresponding commit at
> >> https://github.com/orgcandman/dpdk/commit/ccba975bdfe851b4c8ec3f208451bb105317b76d):
> >> 
> >>   https://travis-ci.org/orgcandman/dpdk/jobs/566044409
> >> 
> > I think the error may be due to having some drivers already linked in while
> > trying to reload all drivers dynamically. The dynamic loading of drivers I
> > actually think we could make more robust. For example:
> >
> > * only load .so files. If you pass in the drivers path from the build, it
> >   errors out trying to load .a files
> > * when loading directories, maybe skip any files which don't have a "librte"
> >   prefix - anyone who has their own drivers they want loaded can add the
> >   prefix or load it explicitly via -d
> > * alternatively, skip files which don't have a pmdinfo section in them
> > * allow skipping of drivers which are already linked in
> > * don't fail the whole process if one driver fails to load from a
> >   directory.
> 
> What change do you suggest I make to the steps I outlined?  I think it
> seems to be more complex than a simple 'ninja install'.
> 
> Maybe it makes sense to merge these patches now and fix the library
> loading code as a separate action?  Or is there a different procedure I
> (and other developers) should follow?  Does it really need a 'ninja
> install' even for a drive-by developer to make a small patch and test
> before submitting?
> 
I think your patch is the best solution for 19.08. Fixing the library
loading for developers is a larger job beyond that. 

Another item for future consideration: since meson/ninja automatically sets
the rpath for binaries in build directory - and then strips that out on
install - it would be really nice if we could leverage that somehow for
finding drivers.

/Bruce