[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] build: use generic march on arm64 when using 'default' machine
Luca Boccassi
bluca at debian.org
Mon Jan 7 14:40:14 CET 2019
On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 12:24 +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 01:56:27PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > When building for generic distribution we need a stable baseline
> > architecture, or depending on the build worker the result will
> > vary.
> >
> > Force the default flags if the user explicitly sets
> > marchine=default
>
> typo: marchine
>
> > at configuration time.
> >
> > Fixes: b1d48c41189a ("build: support ARM with meson")
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca at debian.org>
> > ---
> > config/arm/meson.build | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build
> > index dae55d6b2..fa21a2fd2 100644
> > --- a/config/arm/meson.build
> > +++ b/config/arm/meson.build
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > march_opt = '-march=@0@'.format(machine)
> >
> > arm_force_native_march = false
> > +arm_force_default_march = machine == 'default'
>
> Do we need a new variable here? Given it only seems to be used once
> below,
> I think just having the boolean expression directly in the if
> statement is
> clearer. If you do keep the variable, suggest putting braces around
> the
> comparison, otherwise at first glance it looks like a chained
> assignment
> like you get in C e.g. x = y = 0;
>
> >
> > machine_args_generic = [
> > ['default', ['-march=armv8-a+crc+crypto']],
> > @@ -105,7 +106,11 @@ else
> > cmd_generic = ['generic', '', '', 'default', '']
> > cmd_output = cmd_generic # Set generic by default
> > machine_args = [] # Clear previous machine args
> > - if not meson.is_cross_build()
> > + if arm_force_default_march and not meson.is_cross_build()
> > + machine = impl_generic
> > + cmd_output = cmd_generic
> > + impl_pn = 'default'
> > + elif not meson.is_cross_build()
> > # The script returns ['Implementer', 'Variant',
> > 'Architecture',
> > # 'Primary Part number', 'Revision']
> > detect_vendor = find_program(join_paths(
> > --
> > 2.19.2
> >
>
> With these comments, looks ok to me from a meson viewpoint. I think
> an ack
> from the arm side would be good to get too though.
>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
Fixed typo, removed variable and added the arm maintainers to CC in v2,
thanks.
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
More information about the dev
mailing list