[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] mbuf: add function returning default buffer address
David Marchand
david.marchand at redhat.com
Fri Jan 11 13:48:12 CET 2019
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:57 PM Bruce Richardson <
bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:17:04PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > Olivier, David,
> >
> > could you take a look at naming suggested below and share your thoughts.
> > My fear is that rte_mbuf_buf_addr() is too generic and true for direct
> mbuf
> > only. That's why I'd like to highlight it in the function name.
> >
>
> I would tend to agree with that concern.
>
I understand your concern as well.
The only usecase we have so far is for drivers on the rx side, so
implicitely direct mbufs.
But from a api user pov, explicit is always better.
I will let Olivier have the last word :-)
--
David Marchand
More information about the dev
mailing list