[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/compress: fix size of test buffer

[Kovacevic, Marko]

> Changed size of test buffer to 100 to allow qat to run compress unit-test,
> qat_comp_process_response():
> QAT intermediate buffer may be too small for output, try configuring a larger
> size
> 
> Fixes: c1bbb613ce96 ("test/compress: add out of space test")
> Cc: marko.kovacevic at intel.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic at intel.com>
> ---
>  test/test/test_compressdev.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/test/test/test_compressdev.c b/test/test/test_compressdev.c
> index e8476ed..4db65c4 100644
> --- a/test/test/test_compressdev.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_compressdev.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>  #define GZIP_HEADER_SIZE 10
>  #define GZIP_TRAILER_SIZE 8
> 
> -#define OUT_OF_SPACE_BUF 1
> +#define OUT_OF_SPACE_BUF 100
> 
>  const char *
>  huffman_type_strings[] = {
> @@ -597,13 +597,15 @@ prepare_sgl_bufs(const char *test_buf, struct
> rte_mbuf *head_buf,
>  		uint32_t total_data_size,
>  		struct rte_mempool *small_mbuf_pool,
>  		struct rte_mempool *large_mbuf_pool,
> -		uint8_t limit_segs_in_sgl)
> +		uint8_t limit_segs_in_sgl,
> +		const struct test_data_params *test_params)
>  {
>  	uint32_t remaining_data = total_data_size;
>  	uint16_t num_remaining_segs = DIV_CEIL(remaining_data,
> SMALL_SEG_SIZE);
>  	struct rte_mempool *pool;
>  	struct rte_mbuf *next_seg;
>  	uint32_t data_size;
> +	unsigned int out_of_space = test_params->out_of_space;
>  	char *buf_ptr;
>  	const char *data_ptr = test_buf;
>  	uint16_t i;
> @@ -639,6 +641,10 @@ prepare_sgl_bufs(const char *test_buf, struct
> rte_mbuf *head_buf,
>  	 * Allocate the rest of the segments,
>  	 * copy the rest of the data and chain the segments.
>  	 */
> +	if (out_of_space)
> +		num_remaining_segs = 1;
> +
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_remaining_segs; i++) {
> 
>  		if (i == (num_remaining_segs - 1)) {
> @@ -647,9 +653,11 @@ prepare_sgl_bufs(const char *test_buf, struct
> rte_mbuf *head_buf,
>  				pool = large_mbuf_pool;
>  			else
>  				pool = small_mbuf_pool;
> -			data_size = remaining_data;
> +			out_of_space ? data_size = out_of_space :
> +					(data_size = remaining_data);
>  		} else {
> -			data_size = SMALL_SEG_SIZE;
> +
> +			(data_size = SMALL_SEG_SIZE);
>  			pool = small_mbuf_pool;
>  		}
> 
> @@ -759,7 +767,8 @@ test_deflate_comp_decomp(const struct
> interim_data_params *int_data,
>  					data_size,
>  					ts_params->small_mbuf_pool,
>  					ts_params->large_mbuf_pool,
> -					MAX_SEGS) < 0)
> +					MAX_SEGS,
> +					test_data) < 0)
>  				goto exit;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> @@ -791,7 +800,8 @@ test_deflate_comp_decomp(const struct
> interim_data_params *int_data,
>  					data_size,
>  					ts_params->small_mbuf_pool,
>  					ts_params->large_mbuf_pool,
> -					MAX_SEGS) < 0)
> +					MAX_SEGS,
> +					test_data) < 0)
>  				goto exit;
>  		}
> 
> @@ -1019,7 +1029,8 @@ test_deflate_comp_decomp(const struct
> interim_data_params *int_data,
>  					data_size,
>  					ts_params->small_mbuf_pool,
>  					ts_params->large_mbuf_pool,
> -					MAX_SEGS) < 0)
> +					MAX_SEGS,
> +					test_data) < 0)
>  				goto exit;
>  		}
> 
> --

Self Nack

After some investigation from Pablo and after a conversation was had we have come to the conclusion that there might be an error somewhere else and just a check that needs to be added and that the unit test just exposed it and not that the unit test itself was wrong I can't confirm that as of yet until further investigation is done