[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] net/af_xdp: use mbuf mempool for buffer management
Ye Xiaolong
xiaolong.ye at intel.com
Sun Mar 24 10:08:03 CET 2019
On 03/22, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
>On 3/22/19 2:01 PM, Xiaolong Ye wrote:
>> Now, af_xdp registered memory buffer is managed by rte_mempool. mbuf be
>s/mbuf be allocated/mbuf allocated/
>> allocated from rte_mempool can be convert to xdp_desc's address and vice
>s/convert/converted/
>> versa.
Will fix these spell errors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>> index 9f0012347..6b1bc462a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>> @@ -48,7 +48,11 @@ static int af_xdp_logtype;
>> #define ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE
>> #define ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS 4096
>> -#define ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM 0
>> +/* mempool hdrobj size (64 bytes) + sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) (128 bytes) */
>> +#define ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD 192
>> +/* data start from offset 320 (192 + 128) bytes */
>> +#define ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM \
>> + (ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
>> #define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS
>> #define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_QUEUE_IDX 0
>> @@ -61,7 +65,7 @@ struct xsk_umem_info {
>> struct xsk_ring_prod fq;
>> struct xsk_ring_cons cq;
>> struct xsk_umem *umem;
>> - struct rte_ring *buf_ring;
>> + struct rte_mempool *mb_pool;
>> void *buffer;
>> };
>> @@ -123,12 +127,32 @@ static struct rte_eth_link pmd_link = {
>> .link_autoneg = ETH_LINK_AUTONEG
>> };
>> +static inline struct rte_mbuf *
>> +addr_to_mbuf(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, uint64_t addr)
>> +{
>> + uint64_t offset = (addr / ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE *
>> + ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE);
>> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = (struct rte_mbuf *)((uint64_t)umem->buffer +
>> + offset + ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD -
>> + sizeof(struct rte_mbuf));
>> + mbuf->data_off = addr - offset - ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD;
>> + return mbuf;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline uint64_t
>> +mbuf_to_addr(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
>> +{
>> + return (uint64_t)mbuf->buf_addr + mbuf->data_off -
>> + (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline int
>> reserve_fill_queue(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, int reserve_size)
>> {
>> struct xsk_ring_prod *fq = &umem->fq;
>> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
>> uint32_t idx;
>> - void *addr = NULL;
>> + uint64_t addr;
>> int i, ret;
>> ret = xsk_ring_prod__reserve(fq, reserve_size, &idx);
>> @@ -139,12 +163,14 @@ reserve_fill_queue(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, int reserve_size)
>> for (i = 0; i < reserve_size; i++) {
>> __u64 *fq_addr;
>> - if (rte_ring_dequeue(umem->buf_ring, &addr)) {
>> + mbuf = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(umem->mb_pool);
>> + if (mbuf == NULL) {
>
>unlikely()
Got it.
>
>> i--;
>> break;
>> }
>> + addr = mbuf_to_addr(umem, mbuf);
>> fq_addr = xsk_ring_prod__fill_addr(fq, idx++);
>> - *fq_addr = (uint64_t)addr;
>> + *fq_addr = addr;
>> }
>> xsk_ring_prod__submit(fq, i);
>> @@ -196,7 +222,7 @@ eth_af_xdp_rx(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>> rx_bytes += len;
>> bufs[count++] = mbufs[i];
>> - rte_ring_enqueue(umem->buf_ring, (void *)addr);
>> + rte_pktmbuf_free(addr_to_mbuf(umem, addr));
>> }
>> xsk_ring_cons__release(rx, rcvd);
>> @@ -219,7 +245,7 @@ static void pull_umem_cq(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, int size)
>> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
>> uint64_t addr;
>> addr = *xsk_ring_cons__comp_addr(cq, idx_cq++);
>> - rte_ring_enqueue(umem->buf_ring, (void *)addr);
>> + rte_pktmbuf_free(addr_to_mbuf(umem, addr));
>> }
>> xsk_ring_cons__release(cq, n);
>> @@ -248,7 +274,7 @@ eth_af_xdp_tx(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>> struct pkt_tx_queue *txq = queue;
>> struct xsk_umem_info *umem = txq->pair->umem;
>> struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
>> - void *addrs[ETH_AF_XDP_TX_BATCH_SIZE];
>> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf_to_tx;
>> unsigned long tx_bytes = 0;
>> int i, valid = 0;
>> uint32_t idx_tx;
>> @@ -257,11 +283,6 @@ eth_af_xdp_tx(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>> pull_umem_cq(umem, nb_pkts);
>> - nb_pkts = rte_ring_dequeue_bulk(umem->buf_ring, addrs,
>> - nb_pkts, NULL);
>> - if (nb_pkts == 0)
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> if (xsk_ring_prod__reserve(&txq->tx, nb_pkts, &idx_tx) != nb_pkts) {
>> kick_tx(txq);
>> return 0;
>> @@ -275,7 +296,12 @@ eth_af_xdp_tx(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>> desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&txq->tx, idx_tx + i);
>> mbuf = bufs[i];
>> if (mbuf->pkt_len <= buf_len) {
>> - desc->addr = (uint64_t)addrs[valid];
>> + mbuf_to_tx = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(umem->mb_pool);
>> + if (mbuf_to_tx == NULL) {
>
>unlikely()
Got it.
>
>> + rte_pktmbuf_free(mbuf);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + desc->addr = mbuf_to_addr(umem, mbuf_to_tx);
>> desc->len = mbuf->pkt_len;
>> pkt = xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer,
>> desc->addr);
>> @@ -291,10 +317,6 @@ eth_af_xdp_tx(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
>> kick_tx(txq);
>> - if (valid < nb_pkts)
>> - rte_ring_enqueue_bulk(umem->buf_ring, &addrs[valid],
>> - nb_pkts - valid, NULL);
>> -
>> txq->stats.err_pkts += nb_pkts - valid;
>> txq->stats.tx_pkts += valid;
>> txq->stats.tx_bytes += tx_bytes;
>> @@ -443,16 +465,29 @@ eth_link_update(struct rte_eth_dev *dev __rte_unused,
>> static void xdp_umem_destroy(struct xsk_umem_info *umem)
>> {
>> - free(umem->buffer);
>> - umem->buffer = NULL;
>> -
>> - rte_ring_free(umem->buf_ring);
>> - umem->buf_ring = NULL;
>> + rte_mempool_free(umem->mb_pool);
>> + umem->mb_pool = NULL;
>> rte_free(umem);
>> umem = NULL;
>> }
>> +static inline uint64_t get_base_addr(struct rte_mempool *mp)
>> +{
>> + struct rte_mempool_memhdr *memhdr;
>> +
>> + memhdr = STAILQ_FIRST(&mp->mem_list);
>> + return (uint64_t)(memhdr->addr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline uint64_t get_len(struct rte_mempool *mp)
>> +{
>> + struct rte_mempool_memhdr *memhdr;
>> +
>> + memhdr = STAILQ_FIRST(&mp->mem_list);
>> + return (uint64_t)(memhdr->len);
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(void)
>> {
>> struct xsk_umem_info *umem;
>> @@ -461,9 +496,8 @@ static struct xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(void)
>> .comp_size = ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS,
>> .frame_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE,
>> .frame_headroom = ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM };
>> - void *bufs = NULL;
>> + void *base_addr = NULL;
>> int ret;
>> - uint64_t i;
>> umem = rte_zmalloc_socket("umem", sizeof(*umem), 0, rte_socket_id());
>> if (umem == NULL) {
>> @@ -471,26 +505,20 @@ static struct xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(void)
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> - umem->buf_ring = rte_ring_create("af_xdp_ring",
>> - ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS,
>> - SOCKET_ID_ANY,
>> - 0x0);
>> - if (umem->buf_ring == NULL) {
>> - AF_XDP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to create rte_ring\n");
>> + umem->mb_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create_with_flags("af_xdp_mempool",
>> + ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS,
>> + 250, 0,
>> + ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE -
>> + ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD,
>> + MEMPOOL_F_NO_SPREAD | MEMPOOL_F_PAGE_ALIGN,
>> + SOCKET_ID_ANY);
>> + if (umem->mb_pool == NULL || umem->mb_pool->nb_mem_chunks != 1) {
>> + AF_XDP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to create mempool\n");
>> goto err;
>> }
>> + base_addr = (void *)get_base_addr(umem->mb_pool);
>> - for (i = 0; i < ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS; i++)
>> - rte_ring_enqueue(umem->buf_ring,
>> - (void *)(i * ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE +
>> - ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM));
>> -
>> - if (posix_memalign(&bufs, getpagesize(),
>> - ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS * ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE)) {
>> - AF_XDP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to allocate memory pool.\n");
>> - goto err;
>> - }
>> - ret = xsk_umem__create(&umem->umem, bufs,
>> + ret = xsk_umem__create(&umem->umem, base_addr,
>> ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS * ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE,
>> &umem->fq, &umem->cq,
>> &usr_config);
>> @@ -499,7 +527,7 @@ static struct xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(void)
>> AF_XDP_LOG(ERR, "Failed to create umem");
>> goto err;
>
>You need to destroy mb_pool if xsk_umem__create() fails.
Will do.
Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>> }
>> - umem->buffer = bufs;
>> + umem->buffer = base_addr;
>> return umem;
>> @@ -912,10 +940,9 @@ rte_pmd_af_xdp_remove(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
>> internals = eth_dev->data->dev_private;
>> - rte_ring_free(internals->umem->buf_ring);
>> - rte_free(internals->umem->buffer);
>> rte_free(internals->umem);
>> + rte_mempool_free(internals->umem->mb_pool);
>> rte_eth_dev_release_port(eth_dev);
>>
More information about the dev
mailing list