[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Working Towards Making DPDK Compile with Additional Warning Flags

David Marchand david.marchand at redhat.com
Tue Nov 5 20:35:56 CET 2019


Hello,

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 7:17 PM <devyn.johnson at banduracyber.com> wrote:
>
> From: Devyn Collier Johnson <Devyn.Johnson at BanduraCyber.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Devyn Collier Johnson <Devyn.Johnson at BanduraCyber.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c        |  4 ++--
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_cpuflags.c |  4 ++--
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_errno.c    |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_hexdump.c  |  4 ++--
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_lcore.c    | 10 +++++-----
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c      | 10 +++++-----
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memalloc.c |  8 ++++----
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memory.c   |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c     |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_tailqs.c   |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_memalloc.h        |  8 ++++----
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h         |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h  | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h  |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_errno.h   |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_hexdump.h |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_lcore.h   | 10 +++++-----
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_log.h     |  8 ++++----
>  lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_elem.c         |  4 ++--
>  lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c              |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_class_eth.c           |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_mtr.c                 |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_tm.c                  |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c                  |  4 ++--
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c              |  4 ++--
>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c            |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c                  |  2 +-
>  lib/librte_timer/rte_timer.c                | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  28 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

Thanks for the patch.

It is missing a commitlog describing the problem that you faced, and
explaining how this patch fixes this problem.
It touches a lot of different parts of the dpdk, which will make it
harder to review and (if applicable) harder to backport in stable
branches.

Before submitting new patches, please take the time to read our
contributing guide that you can find here:
http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html


-- 
David Marchand



More information about the dev mailing list