[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] net/af_xdp: support pinning of IRQs
Loftus, Ciara
ciara.loftus at intel.com
Thu Oct 3 15:23:07 CEST 2019
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Monday 30 September 2019 18:12
> To: Loftus, Ciara <ciara.loftus at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye at intel.com>; Laatz, Kevin
> <kevin.laatz at intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] net/af_xdp: support pinning of IRQs
>
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:42:04 +0000
> Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus at intel.com> wrote:
>
> > +/* drivers supported for the queue_irq option */
> > +enum supported_drivers {
> > + I40E_DRIVER,
> > + IXGBE_DRIVER,
> > + MLX5_DRIVER,
> > + NUM_DRIVERS
> > +};
>
> Anything device specific like this raises a red flag to me.
>
> This regex etc, seems like a huge hack. Is there a better way using
> irqbalance and smp_affinity in kernel drivers?
>
> NACK
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for looking at the patch. I understand your concern however unfortunately I haven't been able to identify a way to achieve the desired outcome by using your suggestions of irqbalance and smp_affinity. Did you have something specific in mind or are aware of any generic way of retrieving interrupt numbers for NICs regardless of vendor or range?
I think this feature is really important for the usability of this PMD. Without it, to configure the IRQs the user has to open up /proc/interrupts, trawl through it and identify the correct IRQ number for their given NIC and qid (the format for which is unlikely to be known off-hand), and manually pin them by writing the appropriate values in the appropriate format to the appropriate file - prone to error if not automated IMO.
If the user fails to set the affinity it's probably fine for a single pmd, however with multiple pmds all irqs will by default land on core 0 and lead to terrible performance.
It should be possible to rework the code to remove the regexes and use a direct string compare. Would that make the solution more palatable?
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Ciara
More information about the dev
mailing list