[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] test/atomic: add 128b compare and swap test
David Marchand
david.marchand at redhat.com
Mon Oct 14 17:45:03 CEST 2019
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:29 AM Phil Yang <phil.yang at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Add 128b atomic compare and swap test for aarch64 and x86_64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com>
> Acked-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads at intel.com>
> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
> Tested-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_atomic.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_atomic.c b/app/test/test_atomic.c
> index 43be30e..0dad923 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_atomic.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_atomic.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
> + * Copyright(c) 2019 Arm Limited
> */
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> @@ -20,7 +21,7 @@
> * Atomic Variables
> * ================
> *
> - * - The main test function performs three subtests. The first test
> + * - The main test function performs four subtests. The first test
> * checks that the usual inc/dec/add/sub functions are working
> * correctly:
> *
> @@ -61,11 +62,27 @@
> * atomic_sub(&count, tmp+1);
> *
> * - At the end of the test, the *count* value must be 0.
> + *
> + * - Test "128b compare and swap" (aarch64 and x86_64 only)
> + *
> + * - Initialize 128-bit atomic variables to zero.
> + *
> + * - Invoke ``test_atomici128_cmp_exchange()`` on each lcore. Before doing
Typo, atomic128.
> + * anything else, the cores are waiting a synchro. Each lcore does
> + * these compare and swap (CAS) operations several times::
> + *
> + * Acquired CAS update counter.val[0] + 2; counter.val[1] + 1;
> + * Released CAS update counter.val[0] + 2; counter.val[1] + 1;
> + * Acquired_Released CAS update counter.val[0] + 2; counter.val[1] + 1;
> + * Relaxed CAS update counter.val[0] + 2; counter.val[1] + 1;
> + *
> + * - At the end of the test, the *count128* first 64-bit value and
> + * second 64-bit value differ by the total iterations.
> */
>
> #define NUM_ATOMIC_TYPES 3
>
> -#define N 10000
> +#define N 1000000
This change the number of iterations for this test.
Did you evaluate the impact on the test duration?
I suppose this is fairly quick, but could you explain why this has
been extended?
The commitlog does not give hints.
>
> static rte_atomic16_t a16;
> static rte_atomic32_t a32;
> @@ -216,6 +233,78 @@ test_atomic_dec_and_test(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> +static rte_int128_t count128;
> +
> +/*
> + * rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange() should update a 128 bits counter's first 64
> + * bits by 2 and the second 64 bits by 1 in this test. It should return true
> + * if the compare exchange operation is successful.
> + * This test repeats 128 bits compare and swap operations 10K rounds. In each
s/10K/N/
> + * iteration it runs compare and swap operation with different memory models.
> + */
> +static int
> +test_atomic128_cmp_exchange(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
> +{
> + rte_int128_t expected;
> + int success;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + while (rte_atomic32_read(&synchro) == 0)
> + ;
> +
> + expected = count128;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
> + do {
> + rte_int128_t desired;
> +
> + desired.val[0] = expected.val[0] + 2;
> + desired.val[1] = expected.val[1] + 1;
> +
> + success = rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(&count128,
> + &expected, &desired, 1,
> + __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> + } while (success == 0);
> +
> + do {
> + rte_int128_t desired;
> +
> + desired.val[0] = expected.val[0] + 2;
> + desired.val[1] = expected.val[1] + 1;
> +
> + success = rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(&count128,
> + &expected, &desired, 1,
> + __ATOMIC_RELEASE, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> + } while (success == 0);
> +
> + do {
> + rte_int128_t desired;
> +
> + desired.val[0] = expected.val[0] + 2;
> + desired.val[1] = expected.val[1] + 1;
> +
> + success = rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(&count128,
> + &expected, &desired, 1,
> + __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> + } while (success == 0);
> +
> + do {
> + rte_int128_t desired;
> +
> + desired.val[0] = expected.val[0] + 2;
> + desired.val[1] = expected.val[1] + 1;
> +
> + success = rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(&count128,
> + &expected, &desired, 1,
> + __ATOMIC_RELAXED, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> + } while (success == 0);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static int
> test_atomic(void)
> {
> @@ -340,6 +429,38 @@ test_atomic(void)
> return -1;
> }
>
> +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> + /*
> + * This case tests the functionality of rte_atomic128b_cmp_exchange
> + * API. It calls rte_atomic128b_cmp_exchange with four kinds of memory
> + * models successively on each slave core. Once each 128-bit atomic
> + * compare and swap operation is successful, it updates the global
> + * 128-bit counter by 2 for the first 64-bit and 1 for the second
> + * 64-bit. Each slave core iterates this test 10K times.
N times.
> + * At the end of test, verify whether the first 64-bits of the 128-bit
> + * counter and the second 64bits is differ by the total iterations. If
> + * it is, the test passes.
> + */
> + printf("128b compare and swap test\n");
> + uint64_t iterations = 0;
> +
> + rte_atomic32_clear(&synchro);
> + count128.val[0] = 0;
> + count128.val[1] = 0;
> +
> + rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(test_atomic128_cmp_exchange, NULL,
> + SKIP_MASTER);
> + rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 1);
> + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
> + rte_atomic32_clear(&synchro);
> +
> + iterations = count128.val[0] - count128.val[1];
> + if (iterations != 4*N*(rte_lcore_count()-1)) {
> + printf("128b compare and swap failed\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
David Marchand
More information about the dev
mailing list