[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: enhance GTP support

[Dekel Peled]

Hi Ferruh,

Is this patch ready to be applied in next-net?

Regards,
Dekel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dekel Peled <dekelp at mellanox.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2020 12:21 PM
> To: wenzhuo.lu at intel.com; jingjing.wu at intel.com;
> bernard.iremonger at intel.com
> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan at mellanox.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Ori Kam
> <orika at mellanox.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: enhance GTP support
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Can this patch be applied?
> 
> Regards,
> Dekel
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:28 AM
> > To: Dekel Peled <dekelp at mellanox.com>; wenzhuo.lu at intel.com;
> > jingjing.wu at intel.com; bernard.iremonger at intel.com
> > Cc: Matan Azrad <matan at mellanox.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: enhance GTP support
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Dekel Peled
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:13 AM
> > > To: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>; wenzhuo.lu at intel.com;
> > > jingjing.wu at intel.com; bernard.iremonger at intel.com
> > > Cc: Matan Azrad <matan at mellanox.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: enhance GTP support
> > >
> > > This patch adds CLI option to enter the v_pt_rsv_flags value for GTP
> > > flow pattern item.
> > > It also adds GTP as valid item in raw_encap and raw_decap setting.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp at mellanox.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: remove redundant hton flag.
> > > ---
> > >  app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c index a781545..4877ac6 100644
> > > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ enum index {
> > >  	ITEM_FUZZY,
> > >  	ITEM_FUZZY_THRESH,
> > >  	ITEM_GTP,
> > > +	ITEM_GTP_FLAGS,
> > >  	ITEM_GTP_MSG_TYPE,
> > >  	ITEM_GTP_TEID,
> > >  	ITEM_GTPC,
> > > @@ -938,6 +939,7 @@ struct parse_action_priv {  };
> > >
> > >  static const enum index item_gtp[] = {
> > > +	ITEM_GTP_FLAGS,
> > >  	ITEM_GTP_MSG_TYPE,
> > >  	ITEM_GTP_TEID,
> > >  	ITEM_NEXT,
> > > @@ -2347,12 +2349,18 @@ static int comp_set_raw_index(struct context
> > > *, const struct token *,
> > >  		.next = NEXT(item_gtp),
> > >  		.call = parse_vc,
> > >  	},
> > > +	[ITEM_GTP_FLAGS] = {
> > > +		.name = "v_pt_rsv_flags",
> > > +		.help = "GTP flags",
> > > +		.next = NEXT(item_gtp, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED),
> > > item_param),
> > > +		.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_gtp,
> > > +					v_pt_rsv_flags)),
> > > +	},
> > >  	[ITEM_GTP_MSG_TYPE] = {
> > >  		.name = "msg_type",
> > >  		.help = "GTP message type",
> > >  		.next = NEXT(item_gtp, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED),
> > item_param),
> > > -		.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON(struct rte_flow_item_gtp,
> > > -					     msg_type)),
> > > +		.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_gtp,
> > > msg_type)),
> > >  	},
> > >  	[ITEM_GTP_TEID] = {
> > >  		.name = "teid",
> > > @@ -6604,6 +6612,9 @@ static int comp_set_raw_index(struct context
> > > *, const struct token *,
> > >  			size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_ah);
> > >  			proto = 0x33;
> > >  			break;
> > > +		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP:
> > > +			size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_gtp);
> > > +			break;
> > >  		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PFCP:
> > >  			size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_pfcp);
> > >  			break;
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> >
> > Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com> Thanks, Ori