[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/ice/base: add mask check when find switch recipe
Wei Zhao
wei.zhao1 at intel.com
Fri Apr 10 02:41:56 CEST 2020
In order to find accurate recipe for switch filter, we
need to add mask as an element when searching for recipe.
If we create different rules with the same input set, but
using different masks, then proper recipes should use
those different mask.
Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1 at intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
index c17219274..bc0c368d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
@@ -5012,6 +5012,8 @@ static u16 ice_find_recp(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_prot_lkup_ext *lkup_exts)
if (lkup_exts->n_val_words == recp[i].lkup_exts.n_val_words) {
struct ice_fv_word *a = lkup_exts->fv_words;
struct ice_fv_word *b = recp[i].lkup_exts.fv_words;
+ u16 *c = recp[i].lkup_exts.field_mask;
+ u16 *d = lkup_exts->field_mask;
bool found = true;
u8 p, q;
@@ -5019,7 +5021,8 @@ static u16 ice_find_recp(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_prot_lkup_ext *lkup_exts)
for (q = 0; q < recp[i].lkup_exts.n_val_words;
q++) {
if (a[p].off == b[q].off &&
- a[p].prot_id == b[q].prot_id)
+ a[p].prot_id == b[q].prot_id &&
+ d[p] == c[q])
/* Found the "p"th word in the
* given recipe
*/
--
2.19.1
More information about the dev
mailing list