[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] ip_frag: ensure minimum v6 fragmentation length

[Aaron Conole]

"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com> writes:

>> 
>> In addition, do a formal parameter check.
>> 
>> Acked-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow at partner.samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c | 9 +++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c
>> index 43449970e5..ee984aed82 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c
>> @@ -79,6 +79,15 @@ rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
>>  	uint16_t fragment_offset, frag_size;
>>  	uint64_t frag_bytes_remaining;
>> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Formal parameter checking.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
>> +	    unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) ||
>> +	    unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) || unlikely(pool_indirect == NULL) ||
>> +	    unlikely(mtu_size < 1280))
>
> Same as for ipv4 - LGTM in general, but please avoid hard-coded constants for MTU values.
> Here I couldn't find an existing macro ro min ipv6 mtu, so probably worth to add a new one
> in librte_net/.

I plan to add it in rte_ip.h as RTE_IPV6_MIN_MTU since it seems to fit
there.  I don't think it looks right to add RTE_ETHER_IPV6_MIN_MTU in
the rte_ether.h file (but if you think it looks better I will change to
that).

> With that nit fixed:
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>

Thanks!

>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments (except the
>>  	 * the last fragment) are a multiple of 8 bytes per RFC2460.
>> --
>> 2.25.1