[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ring: future proof flag settings
Honnappa Nagarahalli
Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com
Fri Apr 24 20:07:15 CEST 2020
<snip>
>
> All API's should check that they support the flag values passed.
> These checks ensure that the extra bits can safely be used without risk of ABI
> breakage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> ---
> lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c index
> ebe5ccf0de68..70685121581f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ static struct rte_tailq_elem rte_ring_tailq = { };
> EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ(rte_ring_tailq)
>
> +/* mask of all valid flag values to ring_create() */
> +#define RING_F_MASK 0x007F
Is it better to construct this using the actual flag #defines?
> +
> /* true if x is a power of 2 */
> #define POWEROF2(x) ((((x)-1) & (x)) == 0)
>
> @@ -197,6 +200,13 @@ rte_ring_init(struct rte_ring *r, const char *name,
> unsigned count,
> RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct rte_ring_headtail, tail) !=
> offsetof(struct rte_ring_rts_headtail, tail.val.pos));
>
> + /* future proof flags, only allow supported values */
> + if (flags & ~RING_F_MASK) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, RING,
> + "Unsupported flags requested %#x\n", flags);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> /* init the ring structure */
> memset(r, 0, sizeof(*r));
> ret = strlcpy(r->name, name, sizeof(r->name));
> --
> 2.20.1
More information about the dev
mailing list