[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 13/13] vdpa/mlx5: disable ROCE
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Mon Feb 3 10:27:47 CET 2020
Hi Matan,
On 2/2/20 5:03 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> In order to support virtio queue creation by the FW, ROCE mode
> should be disabled in the device.
>
> Do it by netlink which is like the devlink tool commands:
> 1. devlink dev param set pci/[pci] name enable_roce value false
> cmode driverinit
> 2. devlink dev reload pci/[pci]
> Or by sysfs which is like:
> echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/[pci]/roce_enable
>
> The IB device is matched again after ROCE disabling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan at mellanox.com>
> Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at mellanox.com>
> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/meson.build | 2 +-
> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/mlx5_vdpa.c | 191 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
...
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/mlx5_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/mlx5_vdpa.c
> index 57619d2..710f305 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/mlx5_vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/mlx5_vdpa.c
...
> @@ -246,8 +389,7 @@
> mlx5_vdpa_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv __rte_unused,
> struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev __rte_unused)
> {
> - struct ibv_device **ibv_list;
> - struct ibv_device *ibv_match = NULL;
> + struct ibv_device *ibv;
> struct mlx5_vdpa_priv *priv = NULL;
> struct ibv_context *ctx = NULL;
> struct mlx5_hca_attr attr;
> @@ -258,42 +400,25 @@
> " driver.");
> return 1;
> }
> - errno = 0;
> - ibv_list = mlx5_glue->get_device_list(&ret);
> - if (!ibv_list) {
> - rte_errno = ENOSYS;
> - DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to get device list, is ib_uverbs loaded?");
> + ibv = mlx5_vdpa_get_ib_device_match(&pci_dev->addr);
> + if (!ibv) {
> + DRV_LOG(ERR, "No matching IB device for PCI slot "
> + PCI_PRI_FMT ".", pci_dev->addr.domain,
> + pci_dev->addr.bus, pci_dev->addr.devid,
> + pci_dev->addr.function);
> return -rte_errno;
> - }
> - while (ret-- > 0) {
> - struct rte_pci_addr pci_addr;
> -
> - DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Checking device \"%s\"..", ibv_list[ret]->name);
> - if (mlx5_dev_to_pci_addr(ibv_list[ret]->ibdev_path, &pci_addr))
> - continue;
> - if (pci_dev->addr.domain != pci_addr.domain ||
> - pci_dev->addr.bus != pci_addr.bus ||
> - pci_dev->addr.devid != pci_addr.devid ||
> - pci_dev->addr.function != pci_addr.function)
> - continue;
> + } else {
> DRV_LOG(INFO, "PCI information matches for device \"%s\".",
> - ibv_list[ret]->name);
> - ibv_match = ibv_list[ret];
> - break;
> + ibv->name);
> }
> - mlx5_glue->free_device_list(ibv_list);
> - if (!ibv_match) {
> - DRV_LOG(ERR, "No matching IB device for PCI slot "
> - "%" SCNx32 ":%" SCNx8 ":%" SCNx8 ".%" SCNx8 ".",
> - pci_dev->addr.domain, pci_dev->addr.bus,
> - pci_dev->addr.devid, pci_dev->addr.function);
> - rte_errno = ENOENT;
> - return -rte_errno;
> + if (mlx5_vdpa_roce_disable(&pci_dev->addr, &ibv) != 0) {
> + DRV_LOG(WARNING, "Failed to disable ROCE for \"%s\".",
> + ibv->name);
> + //return -rte_errno;
> }
Is that commented return expected?
More information about the dev
mailing list