[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/10] app/testpmd: parse flow command line for ESP

Ori Kam orika at mellanox.com
Wed Jan 8 15:43:28 CET 2020


Hi just small comment inside.
Thanks,
Ori

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Bernard Iremonger
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 12:16 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; beilei.xing at intel.com; qi.z.zhang at intel.com;
> declan.doherty at intel.com
> Cc: konstantin.ananyev at intel.com; bernard.iremonger at intel.com
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/10] app/testpmd: parse flow command
> line for ESP
> 
> add ITEM_ESP
> add ITEM_ESP_SPI
> add debug to cmdline_flow.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 37
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> index 99dade7..f1b0610 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ enum index {
>  	ITEM_TAG,
>  	ITEM_TAG_DATA,
>  	ITEM_TAG_INDEX,
> +	ITEM_ESP,
> +	ITEM_ESP_SPI,
> 
>  	/* Validate/create actions. */
>  	ACTIONS,
> @@ -746,6 +748,7 @@ static const enum index next_item[] = {
>  	ITEM_PPPOE_PROTO_ID,
>  	ITEM_HIGIG2,
>  	ITEM_TAG,
> +	ITEM_ESP,
>  	END_SET,
>  	ZERO,
>  };
> @@ -1017,6 +1020,12 @@ static const enum index item_higig2[] = {
>  	ZERO,
>  };
> 
> +static const enum index item_esp[] = {
> +	ITEM_ESP_SPI,
> +	ITEM_NEXT,
> +	ZERO,
> +};
> +
>  static const enum index next_set_raw[] = {
>  	SET_RAW_INDEX,
>  	ITEM_ETH,
> @@ -2593,6 +2602,20 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
>  			     NEXT_ENTRY(ITEM_PARAM_IS)),
>  		.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_tag,
> index)),
>  	},
> +	[ITEM_ESP] = {
> +		.name = "esp",
> +		.help = "match ESP header",
> +		.priv = PRIV_ITEM(ESP, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_esp)),
> +		.next = NEXT(item_esp),
> +		.call = parse_vc,
> +	},
> +	[ITEM_ESP_SPI] = {
> +		.name = "spi",
> +		.help = "security policy index",
> +		.next = NEXT(item_esp, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED),
> item_param),
> +		.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON(struct rte_flow_item_esp,
> +				hdr.spi)),
> +	},
>  	/* Validate/create actions. */
>  	[ACTIONS] = {
>  		.name = "actions",
> @@ -6052,6 +6075,9 @@ cmd_flow_tok(cmdline_parse_token_hdr_t **hdr,
>  static void
>  cmd_flow_parsed(const struct buffer *in)
>  {
> +	printf("Flow command line parsed successfully for
> command=%d.\n",
> +			in->command);
> +

Why adding this printf?

>  	switch (in->command) {
>  	case VALIDATE:
>  		port_flow_validate(in->port, &in->args.vc.attr,
> @@ -6230,14 +6256,15 @@ flow_item_default_mask(const struct
> rte_flow_item *item)
>  	case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP:
>  		mask = &rte_flow_item_gtp_mask;
>  		break;
> -	case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP:
> -		mask = &rte_flow_item_esp_mask;
> -		break;
>  	case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GTP_PSC:
>  		mask = &rte_flow_item_gtp_psc_mask;
>  		break;
>  	case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PPPOE_PROTO_ID:
>  		mask = &rte_flow_item_pppoe_proto_id_mask;
> +		break;
> +	case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP:
> +		mask = &rte_flow_item_esp_mask;
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		break;
>  	}
> @@ -6327,6 +6354,10 @@ cmd_set_raw_parsed(const struct buffer *in)
>  		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GENEVE:
>  			size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_geneve);
>  			break;
> +		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ESP:
> +			size = sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_esp);
> +			proto = 0x32;
> +			break;
>  		default:
>  			printf("Error - Not supported item\n");
>  			*total_size = 0;
> --
> 2.7.4



More information about the dev mailing list