[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix copying the name of the dynflag
Ori Kam
orika at mellanox.com
Thu Jan 30 19:55:33 CET 2020
Hi Bernard,
Thanks for review, PSB
Ori
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 6:54 PM
> To: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>;
> Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> <viacheslavo at mellanox.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix copying the name of the dynflag
>
> Hi Ori,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 1:23 PM
> > To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> > <jingjing.wu at intel.com>; Iremonger, Bernard
> > <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; orika at mellanox.com; Yigit, Ferruh
> > <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; viacheslavo at mellanox.com
> > Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix copying the name of the dynflag
> >
> > When working with testpmd and setting the dynflag name, we copy the
> > name given by the cmd to the dynflag name.
> >
> > The issue is that the size of the dynflag name is smaller then the string used
> > by testpmd.
> >
> > This commit solves this issue by usign strncpy.
> >
> > Coverity issue: 353610
> >
> > Fixes: b57b66a97ebf ("app/testpmd: support mbuf dynamic flag")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> > dab22bc..09429f9 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > @@ -18867,7 +18867,7 @@ struct cmd_config_tx_dynf_specific_result {
> > return;
> > flag = rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup(res->name, NULL);
> > if (flag <= 0) {
> > - strcpy(desc_flag.name, res->name);
> > + strncpy(desc_flag.name, res->name,
> > sizeof(*desc_flag.name));
>
> This does not look correct to me.
> Should it be sizeof(desc_flag.name[RTE_MBUF_DYN_NAMESIZE]));
>
You are correct, I will send a new version.
> > desc_flag.flags = 0;
> > flag = rte_mbuf_dynflag_register(&desc_flag);
> > if (flag < 0) {
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
>
> Regards,
>
> Bernard.
More information about the dev
mailing list