[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/service: fix exit by resetting service lcores

[Aaron Conole]

"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren at intel.com> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 4:31 PM
>> To: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren at intel.com>
>> Cc: dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/service: fix exit by resetting service lcores
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 2:32 PM Harry van Haaren
>> <harry.van.haaren at intel.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > This commit releases all service cores from thier role,
>> > returning them to ROLE_RTE on rte_service_finalize().
>> >
>> > This may fix an issue relating to the service cores causing
>> > a race-condition on eal_cleanup(), where the service core
>> > could still be executing while the main thread has already
>> > free-d the service memory, leading to a segfault.
>> 
>> Adding rte_service_lcore_reset_all() just tells a (remaining) service
>> lcore to quit its loop, but does not close the race on lcore_states.
>> 
>> The backtrace shows the same.
>> 
>> (gdb) bt full
>> #0  rte_service_runner_func (arg=<optimized out>) at
>> ../lib/librte_eal/common/rte_service.c:455
>>         service_mask = 1
>>         i = <optimized out>
>>         lcore = 1
>>         cs = 0x1003ea200
>> #1  0x00007ffff72030ef in eal_thread_loop (arg=<optimized out>) at
>> ../lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_thread.c:153
>>         fct_arg = <optimized out>
>>         c = 0 '\000'
>>         n = <optimized out>
>>         ret = <optimized out>
>>         lcore_id = <optimized out>
>>         thread_id = 140737203603200
>>         m2s = 14
>>         s2m = 22
>>         cpuset = "1", '\000' <repeats 175 times>,
>> "\200\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\221\354e\360\377\177", '\000'
>> <repeats 65 times>
>>         __func__ = "eal_thread_loop"
>> #2  0x00007ffff065ddd5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
>> No symbol table info available.
>> #3  0x00007ffff038702d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>> No symbol table info available.
>> 
>> 
>> I added a rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(), to ensure that each service lcore
>> _did_ quit its loop.
>> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ rte_service_finalize(void)
>>                 return;
>> 
>>         rte_service_lcore_reset_all();
>> +       rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
>> 
>>         rte_free(rte_services);
>>         rte_free(lcore_states);
>> 
>> 
>> I can't reproduce with this.
>
> OK - that's good news, thanks for the quick testing & feedback.
>
> Agree with your analysis of the above, indeed waiting for the cores
> explicitly seems the right solution to remove the race.
>
> Will I spin up a v2 patchset with your co-authored-by added and the above
> change included?

Please spin the v2 - I am currently testing with David's incremental on
my setup now.