[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add DBDF action to RTE Flow

Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda kirankumark at marvell.com
Tue Mar 17 11:34:20 CET 2020
Previous message: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add DBDF action to RTE Flow
Next message: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add DBDF action to RTE Flow
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Ori,



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 7:04 PM
> To: Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda <kirankumark at marvell.com>; Wenzhuo Lu
> <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com>; Bernard
> Iremonger <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>; John McNamara
> <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic at intel.com>;
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; Ferruh Yigit
> <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko at solarflare.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add DBDF action to RTE Flow
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Kiran,
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kirankumark at marvell.com <kirankumark at marvell.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 6:06 PM
> > To: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>; Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>;
> > Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com>; Bernard Iremonger
> > <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>; John McNamara
> > <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; Marko Kovacevic
> > <marko.kovacevic at intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>;
> > Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Andrew Rybchenko
> > <arybchenko at solarflare.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark at marvell.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add DBDF action to RTE Flow
> >
> > From: Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark at marvell.com>
> >
> > Adding suuport to DBDF action in the RTE Flow.
> > Application can specify the dbdf value using rte_flow_action_dbdf.
> > Matched traffic will be sent to specified PCI DBDF device.
> >
> I would like to see more detail use case, for example to which device / device
> type will the traffic be routed to?
> 

We have the following use case.
We have 2 PF's pf0, pf1 and corresponding VF's pf0_vf0 , pf1_vf0. And we have 3 applications running.
1st application on pf0 and pf1
2nd application on pf0_vf0
3rd application on pf1_vf0.
We want to direct the traffic matching condition1 from application 1 (traffic  from both pf0 & pf1) needs to send to  application 2 (pf0_vf0)
And matching condition2 from application 1 (traffic from both pf0 & pf1) needs to send to application 3 (pf1_vf0).
To summarize, we need to send traffic from pf0 to pf1_vf0 and traffic from pf1 to pf0_vf0. In this case This DBDF action will be useful.


> > Signed-off-by: Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark at marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c        | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 19 +++++++++
> >  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c       |  1 +
> >  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h       | 16 ++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > index a78154502..c318b4a27 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > @@ -342,8 +342,17 @@ enum index {
> >  	ACTION_SET_IPV4_DSCP_VALUE,
> >  	ACTION_SET_IPV6_DSCP,
> >  	ACTION_SET_IPV6_DSCP_VALUE,
> > +	ACTION_DBDF,
> >  };
> >
> > +#define DBDF_KEY_LENGTH 20
> > +
> > +struct action_dbdf_data {
> > +	struct rte_flow_action_dbdf conf;
> > +	uint8_t dbdf_value[DBDF_KEY_LENGTH]; };
> > +
> > +
> >  /** Maximum size for pattern in struct rte_flow_item_raw. */  #define
> > ITEM_RAW_PATTERN_SIZE 40
> >
> > @@ -1144,6 +1153,7 @@ static const enum index next_action[] = {
> >  	ACTION_SET_META,
> >  	ACTION_SET_IPV4_DSCP,
> >  	ACTION_SET_IPV6_DSCP,
> > +	ACTION_DBDF,
> >  	ZERO,
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -1369,6 +1379,11 @@ static const enum index action_set_ipv6_dscp[] = {
> >  	ZERO,
> >  };
> >
> > +static const enum index action_dbdf[] = {
> > +	ACTION_NEXT,
> > +	ZERO,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int parse_set_raw_encap_decap(struct context *, const struct token *,
> >  				     const char *, unsigned int,
> >  				     void *, unsigned int);
> > @@ -1421,6 +1436,9 @@ static int parse_vc_action_mplsoudp_encap(struct
> > context *,
> >  static int parse_vc_action_mplsoudp_decap(struct context *,
> >  					  const struct token *, const char *,
> >  					  unsigned int, void *, unsigned int);
> > +static int parse_vc_action_dbdf_value(struct context *,
> > +				     const struct token *, const char *,
> > +				     unsigned int, void *, unsigned int);
> >  static int parse_vc_action_raw_encap(struct context *,
> >  				     const struct token *, const char *,
> >  				     unsigned int, void *, unsigned int); @@ -
> 3684,6 +3702,18 @@
> > static const struct token token_list[] = {
> >  			     (struct rte_flow_action_set_dscp, dscp)),
> >  		.call = parse_vc_conf,
> >  	},
> > +	[ACTION_DBDF] = {
> > +		.name = "dbdf",
> > +		.help = "set DBDF value",
> > +		.next = NEXT(action_dbdf, NEXT_ENTRY(STRING)),
> > +		.priv = PRIV_ACTION(DBDF, sizeof(struct action_dbdf_data)),
> > +		.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_ARB(0, 0),
> > +			     ARGS_ENTRY_ARB(0, sizeof(uint8_t)),
> > +			     ARGS_ENTRY_ARB(
> > +			    offsetof(struct action_dbdf_data, dbdf_value),
> > +					    DBDF_KEY_LENGTH)),
> > +		.call = parse_vc_action_dbdf_value,
> > +	},
> >  };
> >
> >  /** Remove and return last entry from argument stack. */ @@ -5064,6
> > +5094,40 @@ parse_vc_action_raw_encap_index(struct context *ctx, const
> > struct token *token,
> >  	return len;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int
> > +parse_vc_action_dbdf_value(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
> > +			  const char *str, unsigned int len, void *buf,
> > +			  unsigned int size)
> > +{
> > +	struct buffer *out = buf;
> > +	struct rte_flow_action *action;
> > +	struct action_dbdf_data *action_dbdf_data = NULL;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = parse_vc(ctx, token, str, len, buf, size);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +	/* Nothing else to do if there is no buffer. */
> > +	if (!out)
> > +		return ret;
> > +	if (!out->args.vc.actions_n)
> > +		return -1;
> > +	action = &out->args.vc.actions[out->args.vc.actions_n - 1];
> > +	/* Point to selected object. */
> > +	ctx->object = out->args.vc.data;
> > +	ctx->objmask = NULL;
> > +	/* Copy the headers to the buffer. */
> > +	action_dbdf_data = ctx->object;
> > +	*action_dbdf_data = (struct action_dbdf_data) {
> > +		.conf = (struct rte_flow_action_dbdf){
> > +			.dbdf_value = action_dbdf_data->dbdf_value,
> > +		},
> > +		.dbdf_value = {},
> > +	};
> > +	action->conf = &action_dbdf_data->conf;
> 
> I think you are missing the setting of the len value in the conf.

Length will be update while parsing the string (parse_string).

> 
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int
> >  parse_vc_action_raw_encap(struct context *ctx, const struct token *token,
> >  			  const char *str, unsigned int len, void *buf, diff --git
> > a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > index 41c147913..b900e283c 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > @@ -2616,6 +2616,25 @@ Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION
> error
> > will be returned.
> >     | ``dscp``  | DSCP in low 6 bits, rest ignore |
> >     +-----------+---------------------------------+
> >
> > +Action: ``DBDF``
> > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > +
> > +Set DBDF value.
> > +
> > +Send traffic to specified PCI DBDF device.
> > +
> > +.. _table_rte_flow_action_dbdf:
> > +
> > +.. table:: DBDF
> > +
> > +   +-----------------+----------------------------+
> > +   | Field           | Value                      |
> > +   +=================+============================+
> > +   | ``length``      | DBDF length                |
> > +   +-----------------+----------------------------+
> > +   | ``dbdf_value``  | DBDF value                 |
> > +   +-----------------+----------------------------+
> > +
> >  Negative types
> >  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c index a5ac1c7fb..6eada7785 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ static const struct rte_flow_desc_data
> > rte_flow_desc_action[] = {
> >  	MK_FLOW_ACTION(SET_META, sizeof(struct
> rte_flow_action_set_meta)),
> >  	MK_FLOW_ACTION(SET_IPV4_DSCP, sizeof(struct
> > rte_flow_action_set_dscp)),
> >  	MK_FLOW_ACTION(SET_IPV6_DSCP, sizeof(struct
> > rte_flow_action_set_dscp)),
> > +	MK_FLOW_ACTION(DBDF, sizeof(struct rte_flow_action_dbdf)),
> >  };
> >
> >  int
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h index b43238b45..b6029c282 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -2082,6 +2082,22 @@ enum rte_flow_action_type {
> >  	 * See struct rte_flow_action_set_dscp.
> >  	 */
> >  	RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DSCP,
> > +
> > +	/**
> > +	 * Send packet to specified PCIe device
> > +	 */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DBDF,
> > +};
> > +
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DBDF
> > + *
> > + * Send the packet to specified PCI DBDF device  */ struct
> > +rte_flow_action_dbdf {
> > +	uint8_t length;
> > +	const uint8_t *dbdf_value;
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> 
> Thanks,
> Ori
Previous message: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add DBDF action to RTE Flow
Next message: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add DBDF action to RTE Flow
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the dev mailing list