[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ipsec: use hash lookup with hash sigs in sad lookup
Ananyev, Konstantin
konstantin.ananyev at intel.com
Tue Mar 24 20:57:35 CET 2020
Hi Vladimir,
> Change hash function from jhash to crc.
> Precalculate hash signatures for a bulk of keys and then
> use rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data() to speed up sad lookup
Looks good in general.
Few thoughts below, nothing major.
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin at intel.com>
> ---
> This patch depends on https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/66460/
>
> lib/librte_ipsec/ipsec_sad.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ipsec/ipsec_sad.c b/lib/librte_ipsec/ipsec_sad.c
> index 2c994ed..3292968 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ipsec/ipsec_sad.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ipsec/ipsec_sad.c
> @@ -2,10 +2,12 @@
> * Copyright(c) 2019 Intel Corporation
> */
>
> +#include <string.h>
> +
> #include <rte_eal_memconfig.h>
> #include <rte_errno.h>
> #include <rte_hash.h>
> -#include <rte_jhash.h>
> +#include <rte_hash_crc.h>
> #include <rte_malloc.h>
> #include <rte_random.h>
> #include <rte_rwlock.h>
> @@ -24,7 +26,7 @@
> /* "SAD_<name>" */
> #define SAD_FORMAT SAD_PREFIX "%s"
>
> -#define DEFAULT_HASH_FUNC rte_jhash
> +#define DEFAULT_HASH_FUNC rte_hash_crc
> #define MIN_HASH_ENTRIES 8U /* From rte_cuckoo_hash.h */
>
> struct hash_cnt {
> @@ -35,6 +37,9 @@ struct hash_cnt {
> struct rte_ipsec_sad {
> char name[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_NAMESIZE];
> struct rte_hash *hash[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_KEY_TYPE_MASK];
> + uint32_t spi_dip_keysize;
> + uint32_t spi_dip_sip_keysize;
Pure stylish thing: might be
uint32_t keysize[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_KEY_TYPE_MASK];
here?
> + uint32_t init_val;
> /* Array to track number of more specific rules
> * (spi_dip or spi_dip_sip). Used only in add/delete
> * as a helper struct.
> @@ -272,6 +277,7 @@ rte_ipsec_sad_create(const char *name, const struct rte_ipsec_sad_conf *conf)
>
> hash_params.hash_func = DEFAULT_HASH_FUNC;
If we doing lookup_with_hash now, might be it makes sense to
do add_with_hash and del_with_hash too?
For code consistency.
> hash_params.hash_func_init_val = rte_rand();
> + sad->init_val = hash_params.hash_func_init_val;
> hash_params.socket_id = conf->socket_id;
> hash_params.name = hash_name;
> if (conf->flags & RTE_IPSEC_SAD_FLAG_RW_CONCURRENCY)
> @@ -295,6 +301,7 @@ rte_ipsec_sad_create(const char *name, const struct rte_ipsec_sad_conf *conf)
> else
> hash_params.key_len +=
> sizeof(((struct rte_ipsec_sadv4_key *)0)->dip);
> + sad->spi_dip_keysize = hash_params.key_len;
> hash_params.entries = RTE_MAX(MIN_HASH_ENTRIES,
> conf->max_sa[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP]);
> sad->hash[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP] = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
> @@ -311,6 +318,7 @@ rte_ipsec_sad_create(const char *name, const struct rte_ipsec_sad_conf *conf)
> else
> hash_params.key_len +=
> sizeof(((struct rte_ipsec_sadv4_key *)0)->sip);
> + sad->spi_dip_sip_keysize = hash_params.key_len;
> hash_params.entries = RTE_MAX(MIN_HASH_ENTRIES,
> conf->max_sa[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP_SIP]);
> sad->hash[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP_SIP] = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
> @@ -440,15 +448,21 @@ __ipsec_sad_lookup(const struct rte_ipsec_sad *sad,
> uint32_t n_3 = 0;
> uint32_t i;
> int found = 0;
> + hash_sig_t hash_sig[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
> + hash_sig_t hash_sig_2[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
> + hash_sig_t hash_sig_3[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX];
>
> - for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> sa[i] = NULL;
> + hash_sig[i] = rte_hash_crc_4byte(keys[i]->v4.spi,
> + sad->init_val);
> + }
>
> /*
> * Lookup keys in SPI only hash table first.
> */
> - rte_hash_lookup_bulk_data(sad->hash[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_ONLY],
> - (const void **)keys, n, &mask_1, sa);
> + rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data(sad->hash[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_ONLY],
> + (const void **)keys, hash_sig, n, &mask_1, sa);
> for (map = mask_1; map; map &= (map - 1)) {
> i = rte_bsf64(map);
> /*
> @@ -457,10 +471,14 @@ __ipsec_sad_lookup(const struct rte_ipsec_sad *sad,
> */
> if ((uintptr_t)sa[i] & RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP_SIP) {
> idx_3[n_3] = i;
> + hash_sig_3[n_3] = rte_hash_crc(keys[i],
> + sad->spi_dip_sip_keysize, sad->init_val);
> keys_3[n_3++] = keys[i];
> }
> if ((uintptr_t)sa[i] & RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP) {
> idx_2[n_2] = i;
> + hash_sig_2[n_2] = rte_hash_crc(keys[i],
> + sad->spi_dip_keysize, sad->init_val);
> keys_2[n_2++] = keys[i];
> }
> /* clear 2 LSB's which indicate the presence
> @@ -471,8 +489,9 @@ __ipsec_sad_lookup(const struct rte_ipsec_sad *sad,
>
> /* Lookup for more specific rules in SPI_DIP table */
> if (n_2 != 0) {
> - rte_hash_lookup_bulk_data(sad->hash[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP],
> - keys_2, n_2, &mask_2, vals_2);
> + rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data(
> + sad->hash[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP],
> + keys_2, hash_sig_2, n_2, &mask_2, vals_2);
> for (map_spec = mask_2; map_spec; map_spec &= (map_spec - 1)) {
> i = rte_bsf64(map_spec);
> sa[idx_2[i]] = vals_2[i];
> @@ -480,8 +499,9 @@ __ipsec_sad_lookup(const struct rte_ipsec_sad *sad,
> }
> /* Lookup for more specific rules in SPI_DIP_SIP table */
> if (n_3 != 0) {
> - rte_hash_lookup_bulk_data(sad->hash[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP_SIP],
> - keys_3, n_3, &mask_3, vals_3);
> + rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data(
> + sad->hash[RTE_IPSEC_SAD_SPI_DIP_SIP],
> + keys_3, hash_sig_3, n_3, &mask_3, vals_3);
> for (map_spec = mask_3; map_spec; map_spec &= (map_spec - 1)) {
> i = rte_bsf64(map_spec);
> sa[idx_3[i]] = vals_3[i];
> --
> 2.7.4
More information about the dev
mailing list