[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/10] test-bbdev: support for offload test for LDPC

Dave Burley dave.burley at accelercomm.com
Fri Mar 27 12:47:26 CET 2020


Acked-by: Dave Burley <dave.burley at accelercomm.com>

On 26/03/2020 03:27, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> From: Nic Chautru <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>
>
> Adding support for the offload latency tests when
> using the LDPC encoder and decoder operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nic Chautru <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>
> ---
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> index c45cdd2..6ec17e5 100644
> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> @@ -4643,7 +4643,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
>   offload_latency_empty_q_test_dec(uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		const uint16_t num_to_process, uint16_t burst_sz,
>   		uint64_t *deq_total_time, uint64_t *deq_min_time,
> -		uint64_t *deq_max_time)
> +		uint64_t *deq_max_time, const enum rte_bbdev_op_type op_type)
>   {
>   	int i, deq_total;
>   	struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ops[MAX_BURST];
> @@ -4657,7 +4657,12 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
>   
>   		if (unlikely(num_to_process - deq_total < burst_sz))
>   			burst_sz = num_to_process - deq_total;
> -		rte_bbdev_dequeue_dec_ops(dev_id, queue_id, ops, burst_sz);
> +		if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC)
> +			rte_bbdev_dequeue_ldpc_dec_ops(dev_id, queue_id, ops,
> +					burst_sz);
> +		else
> +			rte_bbdev_dequeue_dec_ops(dev_id, queue_id, ops,
> +					burst_sz);
>   
>   		deq_last_time = rte_rdtsc_precise() - deq_start_time;
>   		*deq_max_time = RTE_MAX(*deq_max_time, deq_last_time);
> @@ -4672,7 +4677,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
>   offload_latency_empty_q_test_enc(uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t queue_id,
>   		const uint16_t num_to_process, uint16_t burst_sz,
>   		uint64_t *deq_total_time, uint64_t *deq_min_time,
> -		uint64_t *deq_max_time)
> +		uint64_t *deq_max_time, const enum rte_bbdev_op_type op_type)
>   {
>   	int i, deq_total;
>   	struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *ops[MAX_BURST];
> @@ -4685,7 +4690,12 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
>   
>   		if (unlikely(num_to_process - deq_total < burst_sz))
>   			burst_sz = num_to_process - deq_total;
> -		rte_bbdev_dequeue_enc_ops(dev_id, queue_id, ops, burst_sz);
> +		if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_ENC)
> +			rte_bbdev_dequeue_ldpc_enc_ops(dev_id, queue_id, ops,
> +					burst_sz);
> +		else
> +			rte_bbdev_dequeue_enc_ops(dev_id, queue_id, ops,
> +					burst_sz);
>   
>   		deq_last_time = rte_rdtsc_precise() - deq_start_time;
>   		*deq_max_time = RTE_MAX(*deq_max_time, deq_last_time);
> @@ -4695,6 +4705,7 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
>   
>   	return i;
>   }
> +
>   #endif
>   
>   static int
> @@ -4732,14 +4743,15 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
>   	printf("== test: offload latency empty dequeue\ndev: %s, burst size: %u, num ops: %u, op type: %s\n",
>   			info.dev_name, burst_sz, num_to_process, op_type_str);
>   
> -	if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC)
> +	if (op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_TURBO_DEC ||
> +			op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC)
>   		iter = offload_latency_empty_q_test_dec(ad->dev_id, queue_id,
>   				num_to_process, burst_sz, &deq_total_time,
> -				&deq_min_time, &deq_max_time);
> +				&deq_min_time, &deq_max_time, op_type);
>   	else
>   		iter = offload_latency_empty_q_test_enc(ad->dev_id, queue_id,
>   				num_to_process, burst_sz, &deq_total_time,
> -				&deq_min_time, &deq_max_time);
> +				&deq_min_time, &deq_max_time, op_type);
>   
>   	if (iter <= 0)
>   		return TEST_FAILED;


More information about the dev mailing list