[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: optimize pci device probe

[Jerin Jacob]

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:05 PM Maxime Coquelin
<maxime.coquelin at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 5/5/20 6:16 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:50 PM Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Removing this special case could break x86 applications running with
> >>>> legacy virtio.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On the plus side, we have been announcing for some time in virtio:
> >>>> RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_virtio, "* igb_uio | uio_pci_generic | vfio-pci");
> >>>
> >>> What is to conclude?
> >>> # The In-tree virtio driver uses ""* igb_uio | uio_pci_generic |
> >>> vfio-pci"" driver as backend and it does not need RTE_KDRV_NONE?
> >>> OR
> >>> # The in-tree, legacy virtio(const struct virtio_pci_ops legacy_op)
> >>> can work without any kernel driver in the backend. So RTE_KDRV_NONE
> >>> need?
> >>
> >> Ping. What is the conclusion? If it is former then this patch is valid.
> >
> > I am fine with dropping the legacy part, but I wanted to hear from
> > Maxime at least.
> >
> >
>
> IIUC, it means that with Jerin patch, Virtio Legacy devices support will
> be dropped as they won't be probed anymore?

The device drivers with RTE_KDRV_NONE as the backend will not be probed.
1) Are Virtio Legacy devices are type of RTE_KDRV_NONE?
2) if yes, Would you like to support for virtio legacy device?
3) if yes, Please fix RTE_PMD_REGISTER_KMOD_DEP(net_virtio, "* igb_uio
| uio_pci_generic | vfio-pci");




>
> Maxime
>