[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce the deprecation of legacy virtio support

Jerin Jacob jerinjacobk at gmail.com
Mon May 25 07:37:26 CEST 2020


On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 5:14 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 23/05/2020 16:07, jerinj at marvell.com:
> > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
> >
> > The legacy virtio is not architecture agnostics.
> > It relies on x86 IO port scheme support for its working.
> > The legacy virtio is only the consumer of RTE_KDRV_NONE in the DPDK
> > PCI subsystem. Legacy virtio deprecation will also optimize DPDK PCI
> > enumeration management as it does not need to probe RTE_KDRV_NONE based
> > devices anymore.
> >
> > Deprecation is planned for v20.08 release.
> >
> > More details at http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69351/
> >
> > Cc: maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
> > Cc: david.marchand at redhat.com
> > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
> > ---
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +* virtio: The legacy virtio is not architecture agnostics.
> > +  It relies on x86 IO port scheme support for its working.
> > +  The legacy virtio is only the consumer of RTE_KDRV_NONE in DPDK PCI subsystem.
> > +  Legacy virtio deprecation will also optimize DPDK PCI enumeration management as
> > +  it does not need to probe RTE_KDRV_NONE based devices anymore.
> > +  Deprecation is planned for v20.08 release.
>
> What means deprecation exactly?
> When the feature is going to be removed?

I will change the wording. I think, we can target the removal in 20.11 release.

>
> > +  More details at http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69351/
>
>
>


More information about the dev mailing list