[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] common/sfc_efx/base: fix prefix in struct member names

[Ivan Malov]

Hi Ferruh,

Many thanks for your help.

It looks like I forgot to add the line
Fixes: 0902ed140fcf("common/sfc_efx/base: add MAE action set 
provisioning APIs")
to the commit log of the patch.

Currently, the said commit has old suffix used in it:

drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c:927: 
MAE_ACTION_SET_ALLOC_IN_DELIVER, spec->emass_deliver_mport.sel);

The point at which this wrong line is fixed to "emass -> ema" is
0f41b86eff7e ("common/sfc_efx/base: support adding FLAG action to set")
that is, an irrelevant patch.

I apologise for any inconvenience. Does fixing these two commits resolve 
the conflicts?

On 30/10/2020 17:20, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 10/29/2020 7:39 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>> From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov at oktetlabs.ru>
>>
>> In libefx, a struct member name prefix is an abbreviation for the
>> struct name. Fix mismatch in the case of action set spec struct.
>>
>> Fixes: aeacb8458950 ("common/sfc_efx/base: support adding DELIVER 
>> action to set")
>> Fixes: c73d314f790c ("common/sfc_efx/base: support adding VLAN POP 
>> action to set")
>> Fixes: 19aa67196d08 ("common/sfc_efx/base: support adding VLAN PUSH 
>> action")
>> Fixes: 633a89842c17 ("common/sfc_efx/base: support adding MARK action 
>> to set")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov at oktetlabs.ru>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko at solarflare.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amoreton at xilinx.com>
> 
> Squashed into relevant commit in next-net, thanks.
> Please confirm it from latest head of next-net.
> 
> Unfortunately this will cause conflicts to the vendor sub-trees.

-- 
Ivan M