[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure in rcu qsbr perf

[Honnappa Nagarahalli]

<snip>

> 
> Return error if Add/Delete fail in multiwriter perf test
> 
> Fixes: eff30b59cc2e ("test/lpm: add RCU performance tests")
> Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c index
> 45164b23214b..55084816ab91 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,8 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
>  					next_hop_add) != 0) {
>  				printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route#
> %d\n",
>  					i, j);
> +				pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> +				return -1;
Would be good to use the "goto error" method used in this file in other functions.

>  			}
>  			pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>  		}
> @@ -464,6 +466,8 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
>  				large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) {
>  				printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route#
> %d\n",
>  					i, j);
> +				pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> +				return -1;
>  			}
>  			pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
>  		}
> --
> 2.17.1