[dpdk-dev] [v6 1/2] cryptodev: support enqueue & dequeue callback functions

[Gujjar, Abhinandan S]

Hi Thomas,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 9:34 PM
> To: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar at intel.com>
> Cc: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Doherty, Declan
> <declan.doherty at intel.com>; Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com; Ananyev,
> Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Vangati, Narender
> <narender.vangati at intel.com>; jerinj at marvell.com; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; david.marchand at redhat.com; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v6 1/2] cryptodev: support enqueue & dequeue
> callback functions
> 
> 03/11/2020 08:44, Gujjar, Abhinandan S:
> > From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>
> > > As I suggested 2 times that there are documentation issues. Haven't
> > > seen a version To fix that. Please check it at your end and try
> > > fixing the timing of your system so that CI Can pick it for compilation.
> >
> > As far as I remember, I have pulled in all the comments from you for the
> previous patch.
> > >
> > > > I understand that we work in same time zone, getting feedback from
> > > > you in the mid night will not help me/you to pull this patch in.
> > > > A quick response will enable me to prepare patch set quickly and
> > > > send it
> > > across.
> > >
> > > I am not dedicatedly working on your patchset. I will work as per my
> priorities.
> >
> > It is same for me. End of the day, we have mutually agreed to get this feature
> in.
> >
> > > Had it been a CI pass for compilation for both documentation and
> > > code, it would have been applied last night. I could remove those
> > > extra spaces, but there are other issues also as the newly added
> > > APIs are not visible in html files generated. Please ensure that
> > > there are no issues in doxygen build issues and should be able to see the
> newly added APIs in html guides.
> >
> > This is the kind of information I was looking for, which was not
> > available in your previous patch. If this info had been available quickly, I
> would have prepared next patchset.
> 
> It seems you didn't do all the checks you are required to do.
> Please be kind with Akhil who is working hard for the community.
> If you want to accelerate the process, help by reviewing other patches.
> 
I have done enough follow ups with Akhil and we both agreed to get this into RC2.
I did not realize that CI did not pick up the patches because of mismatch with my system time.
All I am saying is giving this information would have helped me.

> > Anyway, I will post the next patch set.
> 
> This is too late.
> We are not supposed to add new API in -rc2, and for sure not after -rc2
> deadline.
> 
> > >
> > > And please note, do not top post your comments. It becomes difficult
> > > to read it in Archives.
> >
> > Ok
> 
> Yes please do not top post, use --in-reply-to to gather all versions in the same
> thread, and fix the clock of your machine.
Ok
> 
>