[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] devtools: test 32-bit build

[Thomas Monjalon]

06/11/2020 18:11, Thomas Monjalon:
> 06/11/2020 18:01, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 05:56:10PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
> > > 
> > > It's reasonably common for patches to have issues when built on 32-bits, so
> > > to prevent this, we can add a 32-bit build (if supported) to the
> > > "test-meson-builds.sh" script. The tricky bit is using a valid
> > > PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR, so for now we use two common possibilities for where that
> > > should point to in order to get a successful build.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> > > ---
> > > v3: unset override
> > >     move and rename override
> > >     split command in check_cc_flags
> > >     use check_cc_flags for x86 default build
> > > v2: added separate flag checking function
> > >     added override of the DPDK_TARGET value
> > >     added /usr/lib32 as possible 32-bit libdir
> > > ---
> > >  devtools/test-meson-builds.sh | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/devtools/test-meson-builds.sh b/devtools/test-meson-builds.sh
> > > index a87de635a2..ac76c2184b 100755
> > > --- a/devtools/test-meson-builds.sh
> > > +++ b/devtools/test-meson-builds.sh
> > > @@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ default_cppflags=$CPPFLAGS
> > >  default_cflags=$CFLAGS
> > >  default_ldflags=$LDFLAGS
> > >  
> > > +check_cc_flags () # <flag to check> <flag2> ...
> > > +{
> > > +	echo 'int main(void) { return 0; }' |
> > > +	cc $@ -x c - -o /dev/null 2> /dev/null
> > 
> > Minor nit, as a continuation of the previous line, I think this should be
> > further indented.
> 
> In general I keep piped commands at the same level.
> This is a matter of taste,
> but I can see other piped commands indented in this file,
> so I will indent this one as well.
> 
> > Otherwise all looks good to me. Thanks for the updated changes.
> 
> Then I will merge it with above change. I guess we won't get more reviews.

Applied