[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] testpmd: add speed capability in device info

[Asaf Penso]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Sarosh Arif
>Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 1:01 PM
>To: ferruh.yigit at intel.com
>Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Sarosh Arif <sarosh.arif at emumba.com>
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] testpmd: add speed capability in device info
>
>Called rte_eth_dev_info_get() in testpmd, to get device info so that speed
>capabilities can be printed under "show device info"
>​
>Bugzilla ID: 496
>Signed-off-by: Sarosh Arif <sarosh.arif at emumba.com>
>---
> app/test-pmd/config.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c index
>30bee3324..e2b3975a3 100644
>--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
>+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>@@ -518,7 +518,9 @@ device_infos_display(const char *identifier)
> 	struct rte_device *dev;
> 	struct rte_devargs da;
> 	portid_t port_id;
>+	struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> 	char devstr[128];
>+	uint32_t speed_capa;
>
> 	memset(&da, 0, sizeof(da));
> 	if (!identifier)
>@@ -569,6 +571,42 @@ device_infos_display(const char *identifier)
> 						      &mac_addr);
> 				rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port(port_id,
>name);
> 				printf("\n\tDevice name: %s", name);

How about extracting the below to a dedicated helper function to make the code more readable?
Something like: void device_infos_display_speeds(uint32_t speed_capa)

>+				rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
>+				speed_capa = dev_info.speed_capa;
>+
>+				printf("\n\tDevice speed capability:");
>+				if (speed_capa ==
>ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG)
>+					printf(" Autonegotiate (all speeds)");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED)
>+					printf(" Disable autonegotiate (fixed
>speed)  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_10M_HD)
>+					printf(" 10 Mbps half-duplex  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_10M)
>+					printf(" 10 Mbps full-duplex  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_100M_HD)
>+					printf(" 100 Mbps half-duplex  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_100M)
>+					printf(" 100 Mbps full-duplex  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_1G)
>+					printf(" 1 Gbps  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_2_5G)
>+					printf(" 2.5 Gbps  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_5G)
>+					printf(" 5 Gbps  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G)
>+					printf(" 10 Gbps  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_20G)
>+					printf(" 20 Gbps  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_25G)
>+					printf(" 25 Gbps  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_50G)
>+					printf(" 50 Gbps  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_56G)
>+					printf(" 56 Gbps  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_100G)
>+					printf(" 100 Gbps  ");
>+				if (speed_capa & ETH_LINK_SPEED_200G)
>+					printf(" 200 Gbps  ");
> 				printf("\n");
> 			}
> 		}
>--
>2.25.1

I'm ok also to leave is as-is.
Reviewed-By: Asaf Penso <asafp at nvidia.com>