[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] lib/ring: add zero copy APIs

Ananyev, Konstantin konstantin.ananyev at intel.com
Fri Oct 23 15:59:22 CEST 2020


> 
> Add zero-copy APIs. These APIs provide the capability to
> copy the data to/from the ring memory directly, without
> having a temporary copy (for ex: an array of mbufs on
> the stack). Use cases that involve copying large amount
> of data to/from the ring can benefit from these APIs.

LGTM in general.
Few nits, see below.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar at arm.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_ring/meson.build        |   1 +
>  lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_elem.h    |   1 +
>  lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_peek_zc.h | 542 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 544 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_peek_zc.h

Need to update documentation: PG and RN.

> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/meson.build b/lib/librte_ring/meson.build
> index 31c0b4649..36fdcb6a5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ring/meson.build
> +++ b/lib/librte_ring/meson.build
> @@ -11,5 +11,6 @@ headers = files('rte_ring.h',
>  		'rte_ring_hts_c11_mem.h',
>  		'rte_ring_peek.h',
>  		'rte_ring_peek_c11_mem.h',
> +		'rte_ring_peek_zc.h',
>  		'rte_ring_rts.h',
>  		'rte_ring_rts_c11_mem.h')
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_elem.h b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_elem.h
> index 938b398fc..7034d29c0 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_elem.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_elem.h
> @@ -1079,6 +1079,7 @@ rte_ring_dequeue_burst_elem(struct rte_ring *r, void *obj_table,
> 
>  #ifdef ALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API
>  #include <rte_ring_peek.h>
> +#include <rte_ring_peek_zc.h>
>  #endif
> 
>  #include <rte_ring.h>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_peek_zc.h b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_peek_zc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..9db2d343f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_peek_zc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,542 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Arm Limited
> + * Copyright (c) 2007-2009 Kip Macy kmacy at freebsd.org
> + * All rights reserved.
> + * Derived from FreeBSD's bufring.h
> + * Used as BSD-3 Licensed with permission from Kip Macy.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _RTE_RING_PEEK_ZC_H_
> +#define _RTE_RING_PEEK_ZC_H_
> +
> +/**
> + * @file
> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> + * It is not recommended to include this file directly.
> + * Please include <rte_ring_elem.h> instead.
> + *
> + * Ring Peek Zero Copy APIs
> + * These APIs make it possible to split public enqueue/dequeue API
> + * into 3 parts:
> + * - enqueue/dequeue start
> + * - copy data to/from the ring
> + * - enqueue/dequeue finish
> + * Along with the advantages of the peek APIs, these APIs provide the ability
> + * to avoid copying of the data to temporary area (for ex: array of mbufs
> + * on the stack).
> + *
> + * Note that currently these APIs are available only for two sync modes:
> + * 1) Single Producer/Single Consumer (RTE_RING_SYNC_ST)
> + * 2) Serialized Producer/Serialized Consumer (RTE_RING_SYNC_MT_HTS).
> + * It is user's responsibility to create/init ring with appropriate sync
> + * modes selected.
> + *
> + * Following are some examples showing the API usage.
> + * 1)
> + * struct elem_obj {uint64_t a; uint32_t b, c;};
> + * struct elem_obj *obj;
> + *
> + * // Create ring with sync type RTE_RING_SYNC_ST or RTE_RING_SYNC_MT_HTS
> + * // Reserve space on the ring
> + * n = rte_ring_enqueue_zc_bulk_elem_start(r, sizeof(elem_obj), 1, &zcd, NULL);
> + *
> + * // Produce the data directly on the ring memory
> + * obj = (struct elem_obj *)zcd->ptr1;
> + * obj.a = rte_get_a();

As obj is a pointer, should be obj->a = ...
Same for b and c.

> + * obj.b = rte_get_b();
> + * obj.c = rte_get_c();
> + * rte_ring_enqueue_zc_elem_finish(ring, n);
> + *
> + * 2)
> + * // Create ring with sync type RTE_RING_SYNC_ST or RTE_RING_SYNC_MT_HTS
> + * // Reserve space on the ring
> + * n = rte_ring_enqueue_zc_burst_start(r, 32, &zcd, NULL);
> + *
> + * // Pkt I/O core polls packets from the NIC
> + * if (n == 32)
> + *	nb_rx = rte_eth_rx_burst(portid, queueid, zcd->ptr1, 32);
> + * else
> + *	nb_rx = rte_eth_rx_burst(portid, queueid, zcd->ptr1, zcd->n1);

Hmm, that doesn't look exactly correct to me.
It could be that n == 32, but we still need to do wrap-around.
Shouldn't it be:

If (n != 0) {
	nb_rx = rte_eth_rx_burst(portid, queueid, zcd->ptr1, zcd->n1);
	if (nb_rx == zcd->n1 && nb_rx != n)
		nb_rx += rte_eth_rx_burst(portid, queueid, zcd->ptr2, n - nb_rx);
}

> + *
> + * // Provide packets to the packet processing cores
> + * rte_ring_enqueue_zc_finish(r, nb_rx);
> + *
> + * Note that between _start_ and _finish_ none other thread can proceed
> + * with enqueue/dequeue operation till _finish_ completes.
> + */
> +
> +#ifdef __cplusplus
> +extern "C" {
> +#endif
> +
> +#include <rte_ring_peek_c11_mem.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * Ring zero-copy information structure.
> + *
> + * This structure contains the pointers and length of the space
> + * reserved on the ring storage.
> + */
> +struct rte_ring_zc_data {
> +	/* Pointer to the first space in the ring */
> +	void **ptr1;

Why not just 'void *ptr1;'?
Same for ptr2.

> +	/* Pointer to the second space in the ring if there is wrap-around */
> +	void **ptr2;
> +	/* Number of elements in the first pointer. If this is equal to
> +	 * the number of elements requested, then ptr2 is NULL.
> +	 * Otherwise, subtracting n1 from number of elements requested
> +	 * will give the number of elements available at ptr2.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned int n1;
> +} __rte_cache_aligned;
> +
> +static __rte_always_inline void
> +__rte_ring_get_elem_addr(struct rte_ring *r, uint32_t head,
> +	uint32_t esize, uint32_t num, void **dst1, uint32_t *n1, void **dst2)
> +{
> +	uint32_t idx, scale, nr_idx;
> +	uint32_t *ring = (uint32_t *)&r[1];
> +
> +	/* Normalize to uint32_t */
> +	scale = esize / sizeof(uint32_t);
> +	idx = head & r->mask;
> +	nr_idx = idx * scale;
> +
> +	*dst1 = ring + nr_idx;
> +	*n1 = num;
> +
> +	if (idx + num > r->size) {
> +		*n1 = r->size - idx;
> +		*dst2 = ring;
> +	}

Seems like missing:
else {*dst2 = NULL;}

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * @internal This function moves prod head value.
> + */
> +static __rte_always_inline unsigned int
> +__rte_ring_do_enqueue_zc_elem_start(struct rte_ring *r, unsigned int esize,
> +		uint32_t n, enum rte_ring_queue_behavior behavior,
> +		struct rte_ring_zc_data *zcd, unsigned int *free_space)
> +{
> +	uint32_t free, head, next;
> +
> +	switch (r->prod.sync_type) {
> +	case RTE_RING_SYNC_ST:
> +		n = __rte_ring_move_prod_head(r, RTE_RING_SYNC_ST, n,
> +			behavior, &head, &next, &free);
> +		__rte_ring_get_elem_addr(r, head, esize, n, (void **)&zcd->ptr1,

If you change ptr1, ptr2 to be just 'void *', then probably no extra type-cast
will be needed here. 

> +			&zcd->n1, (void **)&zcd->ptr2);
> +		break;
> +	case RTE_RING_SYNC_MT_HTS:
> +		n = __rte_ring_hts_move_prod_head(r, n, behavior, &head, &free);
> +		__rte_ring_get_elem_addr(r, head, esize, n, (void **)&zcd->ptr1,
> +			&zcd->n1, (void **)&zcd->ptr2);
> +		break;
> +	case RTE_RING_SYNC_MT:
> +	case RTE_RING_SYNC_MT_RTS:
> +	default:
> +		/* unsupported mode, shouldn't be here */
> +		RTE_ASSERT(0);
> +		n = 0;
> +		free = 0;
> +	}

Would it make sense to move __rte_ring_get_elem_addr() here and do it
only when n != 0?
I.E:

if (n != 0)
	__rte_ring_get_elem_addr(...);
	
Same comments for _dequeue_ analog.

> +
> +	if (free_space != NULL)
> +		*free_space = free - n;
> +	return n;
> +}
> +


More information about the dev mailing list