[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 3/30/2021 9:00 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> Define new rte header for gtp PDU session container
> based on RFC 38415-g30
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at nvidia.com>
> ---
>   lib/librte_net/rte_gtp.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_gtp.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_gtp.h
> index 6a6f9b238d..bfaae26535 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_gtp.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_gtp.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,40 @@ struct rte_gtp_hdr_ext_word {
>   	uint8_t next_ext;     /**< Next Extension Header Type. */
>   }  __rte_packed;
>   
> +/**
> + * Optional extension for GTP with next_ext set to 0x85
> + * defined based on RFC 38415-g30.
> + */
> +__extension__
> +struct rte_gtp_psc {

general consensus in other protocols seems having '_hdr' suffix in the struct 
name, I can see this is extension but do you think does it make to add suffix?

> +	uint8_t ext_hdr_len; /**< PDU ext hdr len in multiples of 4 bytes */
> +	uint8_t type:4; /**< PDU type */
> +	uint8_t qmp:1; /**< Qos Monitoring Packet */
> +	union {
> +		struct {
> +			uint8_t snp:1; /**< Sequence number presence */
> +			uint8_t spare_dl1:2; /**< spare down link bits */
> +		};
> +		struct {
> +			uint8_t dl_delay_ind:1; /**< dl delay result presence */
> +			uint8_t ul_delay_ind:1; /**< ul delay result presence */
> +			uint8_t snp_ul1:1; /**< Sequence number presence ul */
> +		};
> +	};
> +	union {
> +		struct {
> +			uint8_t ppp:1; /**< Paging policy presence */
> +			uint8_t rqi:1; /**< Reflective Qos Indicator */
> +		};
> +		struct {
> +			uint8_t n_delay_ind:1; /**< N3/N9 delay result presence */
> +			uint8_t spare_ul2:1; /**< spare up link bits */
> +		};
> +	};
> +	uint8_t qfi:6; /**< Qos Flow Identifier */
> +	uint8_t data[0]; /**< data feilds */
> +} __rte_packed;
> +
>   /** GTP header length */
>   #define RTE_ETHER_GTP_HLEN \
>   	(sizeof(struct rte_udp_hdr) + sizeof(struct rte_gtp_hdr))
>