[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v16] app/testpmd: support multi-process

[Min Hu (Connor)]

在 2021/7/26 15:28, Min Hu (Connor) 写道:
> 
> 
> 在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>> 26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor):
>>> 在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
>>>> 10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>>> This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd.
>>>>> For example the following commands run two testpmd
>>>>> processes:
>>>>>
>>>>>    * the primary process:
>>>>>
>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \
>>>>>      --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0
>>>>>
>>>>>    * the secondary process:
>>>>>
>>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \
>>>>>      --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29 at huawei.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun at huawei.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
>>>>> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li at intel.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> V16:
>>>>> * revert unrelated changes.
>>>>> * add some restrictions in doc.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed.
>>>>
>>> Hi, Thomas,
>>> This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by".
>>> And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her,
>>> please check it out, thanks.
>>
>> Andrew's comment from v15:
>> "
>> IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to
>> consider is a start point to be applied.
>> "
> Hi, Andrew, Thomos,
>      What is the least thing should be done for this patch to
> meet the state sufficient to be applied?
Hi, all,
	How about this patch, could it be applied?
> 
>>
>>
>> .
>>
> .