[dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] doc: announce changes in security session struct

[Thomas Monjalon]

> > > > > The structure rte_security_session is not directly used
> > > > > by the application. The application just need an opaque
> > > > > pointer to attached to the mbuf or rte_crypto_op while
> > > > > enqueue. Hence, it can be hidden inside the library
> > > > > and would prevent unnecessary indirection to the priv
> > > > > session data in fastpath.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil at marvell.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > +* security: Hide stucture ``rte_security_session`` and expose an opaque
> > > > > +  pointer for the private data to the application which can be attached
> > > > > +  to the packet while enqueuing.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
> > Acked-by: Anoob Joseph <anoobj at marvell.com>
> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>

Applied, thanks.