[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 21.11 3/3] app/test: add allocator performance autotest

Dmitry Kozlyuk dkozlyuk at nvidia.com
Mon Jul 5 14:49:49 CEST 2021


Memory allocator performance is crucial to applications that deal
with large amount of memory or allocate frequently. DPDK allocator
performance is affected by EAL options, API used and, at least,
allocation size. New autotest is intended to be run with different
EAL options. It measures performance with a range of sizes
for dirrerent APIs: rte_malloc, rte_zmalloc, and rte_memzone_reserve.

Work distribution between allocation and deallocation depends on EAL
options. The test prints both times and total time to ease comparison.

Memory can be filled with zeroes at different points of allocation path,
but it always takes considerable fraction of overall timing. This is why
the test measures filling speed and prints how long clearing would take
for each size as a hint.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk at nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at nvidia.com>
---
 app/test/meson.build        |   2 +
 app/test/test_malloc_perf.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 app/test/test_malloc_perf.c

diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index 0a5f425578..4fd2694267 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ test_sources = files(
         'test_lpm6_perf.c',
         'test_lpm_perf.c',
         'test_malloc.c',
+        'test_malloc_perf.c',
         'test_mbuf.c',
         'test_member.c',
         'test_member_perf.c',
@@ -273,6 +274,7 @@ fast_tests = [
 
 perf_test_names = [
         'ring_perf_autotest',
+        'malloc_perf_autotest',
         'mempool_perf_autotest',
         'memcpy_perf_autotest',
         'hash_perf_autotest',
diff --git a/app/test/test_malloc_perf.c b/app/test/test_malloc_perf.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5e9396a5d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/app/test/test_malloc_perf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+#include <inttypes.h>
+#include <rte_errno.h>
+#include <rte_malloc.h>
+#include <rte_memzone.h>
+
+#include "test.h"
+
+typedef void * (alloc_t)(const char *name, size_t size, unsigned int align);
+typedef void (free_t)(void *addr);
+
+static const uint64_t KB = 1 << 10;
+static const uint64_t GB = 1 << 30;
+
+static double
+tsc_to_us(uint64_t tsc, size_t runs)
+{
+	return (double)tsc / rte_get_tsc_hz() * US_PER_S / runs;
+}
+
+static int
+test_memset_perf(double *us_per_gb)
+{
+	static const size_t RUNS = 20;
+
+	void *ptr;
+	size_t i;
+	uint64_t tsc;
+
+	puts("Performance: memset");
+
+	ptr = rte_malloc(NULL, GB, 0);
+	if (ptr == NULL) {
+		printf("rte_malloc(size=%"PRIx64") failed\n", GB);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	tsc = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+	for (i = 0; i < RUNS; i++)
+		memset(ptr, 0, GB);
+	tsc = rte_rdtsc_precise() - tsc;
+
+	*us_per_gb = tsc_to_us(tsc, RUNS);
+	printf("Result: %f.3 GiB/s <=> %.2f us/MiB\n",
+			US_PER_S / *us_per_gb, *us_per_gb / KB);
+
+	rte_free(ptr);
+	putchar('\n');
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_alloc_perf(const char *name, alloc_t *alloc_fn, free_t free_fn,
+		size_t max_runs, double memset_gb_us)
+{
+	static const size_t SIZES[] = {
+			1 << 6, 1 << 7, 1 << 10, 1 << 12, 1 << 16, 1 << 20,
+			1 << 21, 1 << 22, 1 << 24, 1 << 30 };
+
+	size_t i, j;
+	void **ptrs;
+
+	printf("Performance: %s\n", name);
+
+	ptrs = calloc(max_runs, sizeof(ptrs[0]));
+	if (ptrs == NULL) {
+		puts("Cannot allocate memory for pointers");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	printf("%12s%8s%12s%12s%12s%12s\n",
+			"Size (B)", "Runs", "Alloc (us)", "Free (us)",
+			"Total (us)", "memset (us)");
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(SIZES); i++) {
+		size_t size = SIZES[i];
+		size_t runs_done;
+		uint64_t tsc_start, tsc_alloc, tsc_free;
+		double alloc_time, free_time, memset_time;
+
+		tsc_start = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+		for (j = 0; j < max_runs; j++) {
+			ptrs[j] = alloc_fn(NULL, size, 0);
+			if (ptrs[j] == NULL)
+				break;
+		}
+		tsc_alloc = rte_rdtsc_precise() - tsc_start;
+
+		if (j == 0) {
+			printf("%12zu Interrupted: out of memory.\n", size);
+			break;
+		}
+		runs_done = j;
+
+		tsc_start = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+		for (j = 0; j < runs_done && ptrs[j] != NULL; j++)
+			free_fn(ptrs[j]);
+		tsc_free = rte_rdtsc_precise() - tsc_start;
+
+		alloc_time = tsc_to_us(tsc_alloc, runs_done);
+		free_time = tsc_to_us(tsc_free, runs_done);
+		memset_time = memset_gb_us * size / GB;
+		printf("%12zu%8lu%12.2f%12.2f%12.2f%12.2f\n",
+				size, runs_done, alloc_time, free_time,
+				alloc_time + free_time, memset_time);
+
+		memset(ptrs, 0, max_runs * sizeof(ptrs[0]));
+	}
+
+	free(ptrs);
+	putchar('\n');
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void *
+memzone_alloc(const char *name __rte_unused, size_t size, unsigned int align)
+{
+	const struct rte_memzone *mz;
+	char gen_name[RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE];
+
+	snprintf(gen_name, sizeof(gen_name), "test-mz-%"PRIx64, rte_rdtsc());
+	mz = rte_memzone_reserve_aligned(gen_name, size, SOCKET_ID_ANY,
+			RTE_MEMZONE_1GB | RTE_MEMZONE_SIZE_HINT_ONLY, align);
+	return (void *)(uintptr_t)mz;
+}
+
+static void
+memzone_free(void *addr)
+{
+	rte_memzone_free((struct rte_memzone *)addr);
+}
+
+static int
+test_malloc_perf(void)
+{
+	static const size_t MAX_RUNS = 10000;
+
+	double memset_gb_us;
+
+	if (test_memset_perf(&memset_gb_us) < 0)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (test_alloc_perf("rte_malloc", rte_malloc, rte_free,
+			MAX_RUNS, memset_gb_us) < 0)
+		return -1;
+	if (test_alloc_perf("rte_zmalloc", rte_zmalloc, rte_free,
+			MAX_RUNS, memset_gb_us) < 0)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (test_alloc_perf("rte_memzone_reserve", memzone_alloc, memzone_free,
+			RTE_MAX_MEMZONE - 1, memset_gb_us) < 0)
+		return -1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(malloc_perf_autotest, test_malloc_perf);
-- 
2.25.1



More information about the dev mailing list