[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc

[Thomas Monjalon]

08/07/2021 11:39, Andrew Rybchenko:
> On 7/8/21 12:27 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> > Thank you for the review,
> > 
> > Basically it's not used yet since it will break the abi
> > The main usage was in rte_flow item of gtp_psc
> > To replace the current structure with the header definition. And since
> > this will break the abi I'm adding the header definition now but will be
> > used later in rte_flow.
> 
> @Thomas If so, should we accept it in the current release cycle
> or should it simply wait for the code which uses it?

If no need, we can wait next release.


> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *From:* Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
> > *Sent:* Thursday, July 8, 2021, 12:23 PM
> > *To:* Raslan Darawsheh; Singh, Aman Deep; dev at dpdk.org
> > *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc
> > 
> > Hi Raslan,
> > 
> > On 7/6/21 5:24 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> Sorry for missing this mail, for some reason it was missed in my inbox, 
> >> This is the link to this rfc:
> >> https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38_series/38.415/38415-g30.zip
> > <https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38_series/38.415/38415-g30.zip>
> > 
> > Thanks for the link. The patch LGTM, but I have only one question left.
> > Where is it used? Are you going to upstream corresponding code in
> > the release cycle?
> > 
> > Andrew.
> > 
> >> Kindest regards,
> >> Raslan Darawsheh
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko
> >>> Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 5:06 PM
> >>> To: Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] ethdev: add new ext hdr for gtp psc
> >>>
> >>> Hi Raslan,
> >>>
> >>> could you reply, please.
> >>>
> >>> Andrew.
> >>>
> >>> On 6/22/21 10:27 AM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote:
> >>>> Hi Raslan,
> >>>>
> >>>> Can you please provide link to this RFC 38415-g30 I just had some
> >>>> doubt on byte-order conversion as per RFC 1700
> >>>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1700 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1700>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Aman