[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] doc: fix nfp multiport syntax

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Mon Mar 1 14:45:41 CET 2021


On 2/25/2021 11:46 AM, Heinrich Kuhn wrote:
> From: "Chaoyong.He" <chaoyong.he at corigine.com>
> 
> 1. Fixup the suffix of the PCI ID to be consistent with the code.
> 2. Add specification of using MAC address to identify port.
> 
> Fixes: 979f2bae0 ("doc: improve multiport PF in nfp guide")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaoyong.He <chaoyong.he at corigine.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Kuhn <heinrich.kuhn at netronome.com>
> ---
>   doc/guides/nics/nfp.rst | 14 +++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/nfp.rst b/doc/guides/nics/nfp.rst
> index fef99973b..2b170539d 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/nics/nfp.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/nfp.rst
> @@ -117,15 +117,19 @@ although once they are created, DPDK apps should be able to use them as normal
>   PCI ports.
>   
>   NFP ports belonging to same PF can be seen inside PMD initialization with a
> -suffix added to the PCI ID: wwww:xx:yy.z_port_n. For example, a PF with PCI ID
> +suffix added to the PCI ID: wwww:xx:yy.z_portn. For example, a PF with PCI ID
>   0000:03:00.0 and four ports is seen by the PMD code as:
>   
>      .. code-block:: console
>   
> -      0000:03:00.0_port_0
> -      0000:03:00.0_port_1
> -      0000:03:00.0_port_2
> -      0000:03:00.0_port_3
> +      0000:03:00.0_port0
> +      0000:03:00.0_port1
> +      0000:03:00.0_port2
> +      0000:03:00.0_port3
> +

+1 to fix.

> +Some dpdk applications can choose to use the MAC address to identify ports,
> +OVS-DPDK is one such example, please refer to:
> +https://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/dpdk/

This is not PMD specific information, not sure to have here,
also not sure to have an external link here, basically for the maintenance 
concerns, should we document this usage withing DPDK in a wider than a PMD scope?



More information about the dev mailing list