[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Thu Mar 25 18:11:58 CET 2021
25/03/2021 17:40, Aaron Conole:
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> writes:
> >> Travis is not reliable for native Arm and PPC:
> >> https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619/6
> >>
> >> In order to get reliable Travis reports,
> >> the use of Arm machines is removed until Travis fixes it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> >
> > We managed without applying this patch.
> >
> > After one year passed, what is the situation today regarding Travis?
> > Can we rely on Travis service?
>
> So far, yes.
>
> > For which workload? Which architecture?
>
> I think for all of them. Looking at even the failures which pop up for
> the latest patches, they seem like real failures.
>
> ex:
> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493722400
> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493688879
> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493624012
> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493611597
>
> These are ABI, and doc failures - different arches, etc.
>
> Seems like it's quite usable.
>
> > Aaron, what do you recommend?
>
> I think we should drop this patch - Travis continues to be useful even
> for individual developers checking their own results. It seems the
> service works quite a bit better now for the project as well, thanks to
> Honnappa and other ARM folks for working with them.
Thanks all, patch classified as "Rejected".
More information about the dev
mailing list