[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx/base: update MCDI headers

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 4/30/2021 6:05 PM, Ivan Malov wrote:
> Hi Ferruh,
> 
> These changes are imported. Furthermore, originally, these files are
> auto-generated, so in order to fix spelling I can't just apply my edits to the
> imported changes. The fixes are to be made in the original source, and I believe
> this should be somehow discussed internally.
> 
> So, the changeset is either to be applied "as it is" (meaning that the fixes are
> expected to be submitted with future updates) or postponed. Maybe Andrew can
> advise.
> 
> Yes, I see the spelling warnings, they're pretty much valid. But some of them
> are.. questionable. In particular, "misspelling" of the word HIST in
> MC_CMD_LTSSM_HIST_MSGSET. For sure, the suggested replacement doesn't quite fit
> the intended meaning of the macro.
> 

You can ignore invalid warnings.

> Thank you.
> 
> On 30/04/2021 18:56, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 4/28/2021 10:49 AM, Ivan Malov wrote:
>>> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov at oktetlabs.ru>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_regs_mcdi.h   | 3509 +++++++++++++++--
>>>   .../common/sfc_efx/base/efx_regs_mcdi_aoe.h   |  142 +-
>>>   .../common/sfc_efx/base/efx_regs_mcdi_strs.h  |    2 +-
>>>   3 files changed, 3312 insertions(+), 341 deletions(-)
>>
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> There are some checkpatch spelling warnings, can you please check them?
>>
>> Also is there a versioning on the MCDI, if so you may want to document the
>> updated version in driver guide and/or release notes.
>>
>