[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/5] lib/distributor: use wait event scheme
David Hunt
david.hunt at intel.com
Mon Nov 1 13:44:52 CET 2021
On 29/10/2021 2:58 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 1:50 PM Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2 at arm.com> wrote:
>> Instead of polling for bufptr64 to be updated, use
>> wait event for this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2 at arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
>
> With the change in the subject as distributor: ...
> Probably can be fixed in merge time.
>
> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
Acked-by David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com>
>> ---
>> lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c | 10 ++++------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c b/lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c
>> index f4725b1d0b..d52b24a453 100644
>> --- a/lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c
>> +++ b/lib/distributor/rte_distributor_single.c
>> @@ -33,9 +33,8 @@ rte_distributor_request_pkt_single(struct rte_distributor_single *d,
>> union rte_distributor_buffer_single *buf = &d->bufs[worker_id];
>> int64_t req = (((int64_t)(uintptr_t)oldpkt) << RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS)
>> | RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF;
>> - while (unlikely(__atomic_load_n(&buf->bufptr64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
>> - & RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK))
>> - rte_pause();
>> + rte_wait_event(&buf->bufptr64, RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK,
>> + !=, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>>
>> /* Sync with distributor on GET_BUF flag. */
>> __atomic_store_n(&(buf->bufptr64), req, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
>> @@ -74,9 +73,8 @@ rte_distributor_return_pkt_single(struct rte_distributor_single *d,
>> union rte_distributor_buffer_single *buf = &d->bufs[worker_id];
>> uint64_t req = (((int64_t)(uintptr_t)oldpkt) << RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS)
>> | RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF;
>> - while (unlikely(__atomic_load_n(&buf->bufptr64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
>> - & RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK))
>> - rte_pause();
>> + rte_wait_event(&buf->bufptr64, RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK,
>> + !=, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
>>
>> /* Sync with distributor on RETURN_BUF flag. */
>> __atomic_store_n(&(buf->bufptr64), req, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
More information about the dev
mailing list