[PATCH v3 1/1] app/testpmd: add GPU memory option for mbuf pools
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Wed Nov 17 12:48:30 CET 2021
On 11/17/2021 11:31 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 4:56 PM Elena Agostini <eagostini at nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 4:38 PM Elena Agostini <eagostini at nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 03:04:59 +0000
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> <eagostini at nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> From: Elena Agostini <eagostini at nvidia.com>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> This patch introduces GPU memory in testpmd through the gpudev library.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> Testpmd can be used for network benchmarks when using GPU memory
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> instead of regular CPU memory to send and receive packets.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> This option is currently limited to iofwd engine to ensure
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> no workload is applied on packets not accessible from the CPU.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> The options chose is --mbuf-size so buffer split feature across
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> different mempools can be enabled.
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Elena Agostini <eagostini at nvidia.com>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> Won't this create a hard dependency of test-pmd on gpudev?
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>> I thought gpudev was supposed to be optional
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> Sure, let me submit another patch to make it optional
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Why to add yet another compile time macro everywhere in testpmd and
>>
>>> make hard to maintain?
>>
>>> Adding iofwd kind of code is very simple to add test/test-gpudev and
>>
>>> all GPU specific options
>>
>>> can be added in test-gpudev. It also helps to review the patches as
>>
>>> test cases focus on
>>
>>> each device class.
>>
>>
>>
>> Test-gpudev is standalone unit test to ensure gpudev functions work correctly.
>>
>> In testpmd instead, there is a connection between gpudev and the network.
>
> I understand that. We had the same case with eventdev, where it needs to
> work with network. Testpmd is already complicated, IMO, we should
> focus only ethdev
> test cases on testpmd, test-gpudev can use ethdev API to enable
> networking requirements for gpudev.
>
+1
More information about the dev
mailing list