[EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: deprecation notice to remove octeontx2 drivers

[Thomas Monjalon]

12/11/2021 12:24, Akhil Goyal:
> > On 11/9/2021 3:51 PM, jerinj at marvell.com wrote:
> > > From: Jerin Jacob<jerinj at marvell.com>
> > >
> > > In the view of enabling unified driver for octeontx2(cn9k)/
> > > octeontx3(cn10k), removing drivers/octeontx2 drivers and
> > > replace with drivers/cnxk/ which supports both octeontx2(cn9k)
> > > and octeontx3(cn10k) SoCs.
> > >
> > > This deprecation notice is to do following actions in DPDK v22.02
> > > version.
> > > - Replace drivers/common/octeontx2/ with drivers/common/cnxk/
> > > - Replace drivers/mempool/octeontx2/ with drivers/mempool/cnxk/
> > > - Replace drivers/net/octeontx2/ with drivers/net/cnxk/
> > > - Replace drivers/event/octeontx2/ with drivers/event/cnxk/
> > > - Replace drivers/crypto/octeontx2/ with drivers/crypto/cnxk/
> > > - Rename drivers/regex/octeontx2/ as drivers/regex/cn9k/
> > > - Rename config/arm/arm64_octeontx2_linux_gcc as
> > >    config/arm/arm64_cn9k_linux_gcc
> > >
> > > Last two actions are to align naming convention as cnxk scheme.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob<jerinj at marvell.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> Corresponding documentation would also be removed.
> Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil at marvell.com>

No need to repeat the full notice in the commit message.
I would remove it.

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>