[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 10/12] net/mlx5: support E-Switch port flow action
Andrew Rybchenko
andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru
Fri Oct 1 15:47:14 CEST 2021
PORT_ID action implementation has the same semantics as
ESWITCH_PORT action in net/mlx5 case.
Helper functions keep port_id suffix since internally it is
still a MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_PORT_ID action.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index b610ad3ef4..98f15b328f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -5048,14 +5048,14 @@ flow_dv_validate_action_jump(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
}
/*
- * Validate the port_id action.
+ * Validate the port ID or E-Switch port action.
*
* @param[in] dev
* Pointer to rte_eth_dev structure.
* @param[in] action_flags
* Bit-fields that holds the actions detected until now.
* @param[in] action
- * Port_id RTE action structure.
+ * PORT_ID or ESWITCH_PORT RTE action structure.
* @param[in] attr
* Attributes of flow that includes this action.
* @param[out] error
@@ -5072,6 +5072,7 @@ flow_dv_validate_action_port_id(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
const struct rte_flow_action_port_id *port_id;
+ const struct rte_flow_action_ethdev *ethdev;
struct mlx5_priv *act_priv;
struct mlx5_priv *dev_priv;
uint16_t port;
@@ -5080,13 +5081,13 @@ flow_dv_validate_action_port_id(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL,
- "port id action is valid in transfer"
+ "port action is valid in transfer"
" mode only");
if (!action || !action->conf)
return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION_CONF,
NULL,
- "port id action parameters must be"
+ "port action parameters must be"
" specified");
if (action_flags & (MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ACTIONS |
MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ESWITCH_ACTIONS))
@@ -5100,13 +5101,26 @@ flow_dv_validate_action_port_id(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL,
"failed to obtain E-Switch info");
- port_id = action->conf;
- port = port_id->original ? dev->data->port_id : port_id->id;
+ switch (action->type) {
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID:
+ port_id = action->conf;
+ port = port_id->original ? dev->data->port_id : port_id->id;
+ break;
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_ESWITCH_PORT:
+ ethdev = action->conf;
+ port = ethdev->id;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return rte_flow_error_set
+ (error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, action,
+ "unknown E-Switch action");
+ }
act_priv = mlx5_port_to_eswitch_info(port, false);
if (!act_priv)
return rte_flow_error_set
(error, rte_errno,
- RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION_CONF, port_id,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION_CONF, action->conf,
"failed to obtain E-Switch port id for port");
if (act_priv->domain_id != dev_priv->domain_id)
return rte_flow_error_set
@@ -5669,6 +5683,7 @@ flow_dv_validate_action_sample(uint64_t *action_flags,
++actions_n;
break;
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID:
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_ESWITCH_PORT:
ret = flow_dv_validate_action_port_id(dev,
sub_action_flags,
act,
@@ -7296,6 +7311,7 @@ flow_dv_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_VOID:
break;
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID:
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_ESWITCH_PORT:
ret = flow_dv_validate_action_port_id(dev,
action_flags,
actions,
@@ -10770,12 +10786,12 @@ flow_dv_tag_release(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
}
/**
- * Translate port ID action to vport.
+ * Translate port ID or E-Switch port action to vport.
*
* @param[in] dev
* Pointer to rte_eth_dev structure.
* @param[in] action
- * Pointer to the port ID action.
+ * Pointer to the port ID or E-Switch port action.
* @param[out] dst_port_id
* The target port ID.
* @param[out] error
@@ -10792,10 +10808,28 @@ flow_dv_translate_action_port_id(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
{
uint32_t port;
struct mlx5_priv *priv;
- const struct rte_flow_action_port_id *conf =
- (const struct rte_flow_action_port_id *)action->conf;
- port = conf->original ? dev->data->port_id : conf->id;
+ switch (action->type) {
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID: {
+ const struct rte_flow_action_port_id *conf;
+
+ conf = (const struct rte_flow_action_port_id *)action->conf;
+ port = conf->original ? dev->data->port_id : conf->id;
+ break;
+ }
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_ESWITCH_PORT: {
+ const struct rte_flow_action_ethdev *ethdev;
+
+ ethdev = (const struct rte_flow_action_ethdev *)action->conf;
+ port = ethdev->id;
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, action,
+ "unknown E-Switch action");
+ }
+
priv = mlx5_port_to_eswitch_info(port, false);
if (!priv)
return rte_flow_error_set(error, -rte_errno,
@@ -11634,6 +11668,7 @@ flow_dv_translate_action_sample(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
break;
}
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID:
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_ESWITCH_PORT:
{
struct mlx5_flow_dv_port_id_action_resource
port_id_resource;
@@ -12714,6 +12749,7 @@ flow_dv_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_VOID:
break;
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID:
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_ESWITCH_PORT:
if (flow_dv_translate_action_port_id(dev, action,
&port_id, error))
return -rte_errno;
@@ -15475,6 +15511,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_domain_policy_acts(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
break;
}
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID:
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_ESWITCH_PORT:
{
struct mlx5_flow_dv_port_id_action_resource
port_id_resource;
@@ -17683,6 +17720,7 @@ flow_dv_validate_mtr_policy_acts(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
NULL, "too many actions");
switch (act->type) {
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID:
+ case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_ESWITCH_PORT:
if (!priv->config.dv_esw_en)
return -rte_mtr_error_set(error,
ENOTSUP,
--
2.30.2
More information about the dev
mailing list