dpdk-22.07

[Stephen Hemminger]

Please choose a stable version 22.11 soon, or 21.11.  bugs in 22.07 will
not be fixed

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022, 11:38 PM Michael Lekar <MichaelLe at radware.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
>
> My name is Michaele and I work in Radware Ltd . Currently we use 17.11.3
> version of dpdk in our product.  Now we want to evaluate 22.07 version of
> dpdk.  We want to build statically linkage dpdk-test application and run it
> on our device. We use 7.5 version of gcc. By default, dpdk-test uses shared
> library, and we don’t find how to configure meson for build these test
> application static. We will be very applicate for any help with issue.
>
>
>
>
>
> [ulp-ng]# ldd dpdk-test
>
> ./dpdk-test: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.16' not
> found (required by ./dpdk-test)
>
> ./dpdk-test: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not
> found (required by ./dpdk-test)
>
> ./dpdk-test: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not
> found (required by ./dpdk-test)
>
> ./dpdk-test: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not
> found (required by ./dpdk-test)
>
>         linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007ffff7ffd000)
>
>         libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007ffff7cfd000)
>
>         libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007ffff7af9000)
>
>         libnuma.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnuma.so.1 (0x00007ffff78ed000)
>
>         libpcap.so.1 => /usr/lib/libpcap.so.1 (0x00007ffff76ac000)
>
>         libatomic.so.1 => /usr/lib/libatomic.so.1 (0x00007ffff74a4000)
>
>         libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
> (0x00007ffff7286000)
>
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007ffff6ec9000)
>
>         /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000)
>
> [ulp-ng]#
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20220824/dc131241/attachment.htm>