Confirm if rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify should be experimental

[Ben Magistro]

This may simply be a docs and signature mismatch (or macro wasn't available
at the time, didn't check that aspect) but the function
rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify() is marked as experimental in the signature
but not in the associated function comments (doxygen).  Should this
function be considered experimental and the docs section updated or is this
considered a stable function and the signature should updated?

Introduced in
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210630135158.8108-4-olivier.matz@6wind.com/


Thanks,

Ben Magistro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20220526/54f7ff6f/attachment.htm>