[PATCH v4] testpmd: cleanup cleanly from signal
Mattias Rönnblom
hofors at lysator.liu.se
Wed Nov 9 22:46:55 CET 2022
On 2022-11-09 05:10, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Do a clean shutdown of testpmd when a signal is received;
> instead of having testpmd kill itself.
> This fixes problem where a signal could be received
> in the middle of a PMD and then the signal handler would call
> PMD's close routine which could cause a deadlock.
>
> Added benefit is it gets rid of Windows specific code.
>
> Fixes: d9a191a00e81 ("app/testpmd: fix quitting in container")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> ---
> v4 - use select() because that is available on Windows; and other
> functions poll() and sigaction() are not.
>
> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> index cf5942d0c422..274e96cac2d4 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #endif
> +#include <sys/select.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> @@ -4251,26 +4252,11 @@ print_stats(void)
> static void
> signal_handler(int signum)
> {
> - if (signum == SIGINT || signum == SIGTERM) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "\nSignal %d received, preparing to exit...\n",
> - signum);
> -#ifdef RTE_LIB_PDUMP
> - /* uninitialize packet capture framework */
> - rte_pdump_uninit();
> -#endif
> -#ifdef RTE_LIB_LATENCYSTATS
> - if (latencystats_enabled != 0)
> - rte_latencystats_uninit();
> -#endif
> - force_quit();
> - /* Set flag to indicate the force termination. */
> - f_quit = 1;
> - /* exit with the expected status */
> -#ifndef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
> - signal(signum, SIG_DFL);
> - kill(getpid(), signum);
> -#endif
> - }
> + fprintf(stderr, "\nSignal %d %s received, preparing to exit...\n",
> + signum, strsignal(signum));
fprintf() is not async signal safe, and neither is strsignal().
This is not a regression introduced by this patch, but I thought it
might be worth fixing.
> +
> + /* Set flag to indicate the force termination. */
> + f_quit = 1;
> }
>
> int
> @@ -4449,9 +4435,6 @@ main(int argc, char** argv)
> } else
> #endif
> {
> - char c;
> - int rc;
> -
> f_quit = 0;
>
> printf("No commandline core given, start packet forwarding\n");
> @@ -4476,15 +4459,37 @@ main(int argc, char** argv)
> prev_time = cur_time;
> rte_delay_us_sleep(US_PER_S);
> }
> - }
> + } else {
> + char c;
> + fd_set fds;
>
> - printf("Press enter to exit\n");
> - rc = read(0, &c, 1);
> - pmd_test_exit();
> - if (rc < 0)
> - return 1;
> + printf("Press enter to exit\n");
> +
> + FD_ZERO(&fds);
> + FD_SET(0, &fds);
> +
> + if (select(1, &fds, NULL, NULL, NULL) <= 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "Select failed: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
Why is select() needed? Wouldn't a blocking read suffice? Or getchar().
> + } else if (read(0, &c, 1) <= 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr,
> + "Read stdin failed: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + }
> + }
> + stop_packet_forwarding();
> + force_quit();
> }
>
> +#ifdef RTE_LIB_PDUMP
> + /* uninitialize packet capture framework */
> + rte_pdump_uninit();
> +#endif
> +#ifdef RTE_LIB_LATENCYSTATS
> + if (latencystats_enabled != 0)
> + rte_latencystats_uninit();
> +#endif
> +
> ret = rte_eal_cleanup();
> if (ret != 0)
> rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
More information about the dev
mailing list