[PATCH v2 2/2] doc: simplify the binding steps

[Chautru, Nicolas]

Hi Thomas, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 12:35 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; gakhil at marvell.com; maxime.coquelin at redhat.com;
> Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] doc: simplify the binding steps
> 
> 22/11/2022 22:21, Chautru, Nicolas:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> > > 15/11/2022 20:59, Nicolas Chautru:
> > > > -The PCI virtual functions must be configured before working or
> > > > getting assigned -to VMs/Containers. The configuration involves
> > > > allocating the number of hardware
> > > > +The device must be configured to work properly.
> > > > +The configuration involves allocating the number of hardware
> > > >  queues, priorities, load balance, bandwidth and other settings
> > > > necessary for the  device to perform FEC functions.
> > > >
> > > >  This configuration needs to be executed at least once after
> > > > reboot or PCI FLR and can -be achieved by using the functions
> > > > ``rte_acc10x_configure()``,
> > > > +be achieved by either using ``pf_bb_config`` or the function
> > > > +``rte_acc10x_configure()``,
> > > >  which sets up the parameters defined in the compatible
> > > > ``acc100_conf``
> > > structure.
> > > > +This is the method used in the bbdev-test test application.
> > >
> > > Clearly this patch is more than "simplifying binding steps".
> > >
> >
> > The intent has indeed to remove much of the binding steps to point to
> generic document, then minor updates to keep the flow readable and
> informative.
> > Let me know what you are referring to specifically which caught your eyes.
> > Some of the FPGA configuration steps were also simplifies to align with the
> other PMDs.
> > We can rename if you prefer as doc: simplify the binding and configuration
> steps. Or split but unsure of the value. Up to you.
> 
> You are adding more information.
> One example is above.
> I think it deserves a separate commit to understand which info you add and
> why.
> 

To avoid iterations, you just want to split this commit again into two: 
- doc: simplify the binding steps
- doc: simplify and clarify the configuration steps

Thanks for confirming. 
Nic