[PATCH v2 1/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction
Morten Brørup
mb at smartsharesystems.com
Mon Nov 28 18:22:10 CET 2022
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roretzla at linux.microsoft.com]
> Sent: Monday, 28 November 2022 18.14
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roretzla at linux.microsoft.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2022 00.43
> > >
> > > Provide an abstraction for leading and trailing zero bit counting
> > > functions to hide compiler specific intrinsics and builtins.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla at linux.microsoft.com>
> > > ---
> >
>
> let me unpack what is being asked for here.
>
> > Related functions already exist in lib/eal/include/rte_common.h.
>
> i don't understand. are you saying these inline functions duplicate
> existing bit counting functionality? if so i'll relocate any you
> identify.
Sorry about not being clear about my intentions with the feedback.
I'm not asking for anything; I only wanted to point at the similar family of functions in rte_common.h, to make sure that you were aware of them.
>
> >
> > If some functions are missing, it would be good to add them.
>
> the change here is to address a specific family of functions that are
> impeding portability of the rte_common.h header and nothing more.
>
> i'm open to having a separate mail thread discussing what other
> functions we might want and whether to relocate code out of
> rte_common.h
> since that is likely to be a drawn out discussion it shouldn't be a
> blocking dependency of this series.
I do not request any new functions; I'll leave it up to you to decide if anything would be good to add.
>
> >
> > Also, it makes sense moving them out of rte_common.h.
>
> thanks!
Thank you! Cleaning up is always appreciated.
More information about the dev
mailing list