[RFC PATCH 0/1] Specify C-standard requirement for DPDK builds
Bruce Richardson
bruce.richardson at intel.com
Fri Feb 3 16:09:40 CET 2023
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:09:14AM -0500, Ben Magistro wrote:
> Since this topic keeps coming up in other threads I'll chime in with my
> $0.01 here. We've been using CentOS 7 for awhile (and working on
> migrating off) but have had to leverage devtoolset/llvmtoolset for
> various reasons. I remember a discussion of installing a different
> compiler coming up but don't remember which thread that was in/what the
> outcome was. While I'd like to just brush over C7 and say there is a
> compatible compiler available so just make the change I also realize
> that making that change could be quite disruptive to existing code
> bases.
> However, the 22.11 LTS will be EOL in Nov 2024. CentOS 7 is EOL Jun
> 2024. For the 23.x series and going forward I don't think starting
> with a C11 requirement is an unreasonable ask.
>
Thanks for that input. If we drop support for Centos/RHEL 7, I think we
should be ok to pass -std=c11 for the build of DPDK.
Have you any thoughts on the second part of the c11 move - where our
headers require c11 support and therefore may require that the end user
builds their own code using -std=c11? This latter part is the bit that
concerns me a little, as I feel it may be problematic for some with older
codebases.
/Bruce
More information about the dev
mailing list