[PATCH] mbuf: replace RTE_LOGTYPE_MBUF with dynamic type

Stephen Hemminger stephen at networkplumber.org
Tue Feb 7 17:19:32 CET 2023

Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] mbuf: replace RTE_LOGTYPE_MBUF with dynamic type
Next message (by thread): [PATCH] mbuf: replace RTE_LOGTYPE_MBUF with dynamic type
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 09:34:13 +0100
David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com> wrote:

> Why do we need a new naming convention?
> Please use RTE_LOG_REGISTER_DEFAULT.

Should be use RTE_LOG_REGISTER_SUFFIX( ) with "mbuf"

Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] mbuf: replace RTE_LOGTYPE_MBUF with dynamic type
Next message (by thread): [PATCH] mbuf: replace RTE_LOGTYPE_MBUF with dynamic type
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the dev mailing list